Just to answer myself: It turns out gda-sharp belongs to the
gtk-sharp package (not entirely logical to a newbie like me :)
but its not contained in the gtk-sharp rpm (0.31). Its compiled
by default when using the gtk-sharp 0.31 tarball.
Is gda-sharp deprecidated or why is it not included in
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 22:51, Soeren wrote:
Just to answer myself: It turns out gda-sharp belongs to the
gtk-sharp package (not entirely logical to a newbie like me :)
but its not contained in the gtk-sharp rpm (0.31). Its compiled
by default when using the gtk-sharp 0.31 tarball.
Is
Sounds like a great idea Cory, maybe we should put together a little poll
to see how much interest there is.
Cory wrote:
I've been looking into linux boxes that have mod_mono support, sounds
cool.
A good idea may be to buy a dedicated server then split the monthly cost
across it's users. That
Hi lists, (hope this does not get mis-understood... I'm not subscribed
to any of the non-mono-lists :-( although I maybe should be)
this problem I have seen with Mono and the other .NET implementations is
just the problem the original poster poses. There is not real
commitment to/clear
I'm interested to know what your (and others') problems with GTK# are and
what you mean by support -- are you finding it difficult to learn, in
other words would better documentation help? Or are you finding it difficult
to use, things aren't working as advertised, that kind of thing?
Jeffrey
Also have to mention that GTK# can be used on the windows
side.
Giuseppe Greco wrote:
Hi Marcus,
Of course, Mono is still under development, but the most
important components are there, and they work. Here, at
Agamura, we are developing a sophisticated online gaming
delivery network on Linux with
Nonsense. Mono and Gtk# work extremely well today. I know, I've built a
fully functional app (Gfax) and all one has to do is look at a few other
apps such as F-Spot, Muine, Monodoc and Monodevelop to realize this.
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 23:05, Joop wrote:
Hi lists, (hope this does not get
On Thursday 08 April 2004 1:31 am, Michael J. Ryan wrote:
Also have to mention that GTK# can be used on the windows
side.
First Qt was bad because it wasn't GPL. Now it's bad because it's GPL. I
don't get it.
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL
On Friday 09 April 2004 1:35 am, George Farris wrote:
Nonsense. Mono and Gtk# work extremely well today. I know, I've built a
fully functional app (Gfax) and all one has to do is look at a few other
apps such as F-Spot, Muine, Monodoc and Monodevelop to realize this.
If someone would actually
I think one of the things most frustrating is the 'getting it going'. I
have a hard time to get everything in sync. What version of what package
should I use, etc. etc. I'd love to get Monodevelop running, but that
often depends on un-released parts. Or on parts that are only available
as
In 1997 I worked for a company that was developing
a broadcast platform, and we used to develop in C++
on Linux with Qt... Even if I prefer GTK+, I must admit that
Qt was a very nice portable C++ framework.
Furthermore, even if GTK+ is one of my preferred frameworks,
I tend to avoid Gtk# (which
Joop, Marcus, et al,
I understand your frustrations. Yes, you are right, all the
file/networking/HTML/etc. is there, and GUI is still in it's infancy. IMO
the reasons are that first, it's often much easier to write these lower
level APIs, and second, GUI APIs are usually layered on top of almost
It's no use building 50 wrappers for GUI toolkits, we need a single
stable 100% working toolkit.
A GUI toolkit will only succeed if
- It runs on both Windows *Nix platforms without restrictions
- It can be easely installed by grandpa and grandma
- There is a good GUI form editor available
El jue, 08-04-2004 a las 01:31, Juan Miguel escribió:
Hello,
I've compiled XSP from cvs whithout problems. It serves
plain html fine, but when I try to get an aspx page I'm
getting the following...
I've found some references to remove the .wapi directory.
I've removed it but the
It's no use building 50 wrappers for GUI toolkits, we need a single
stable 100% working toolkit.
I agree...
A GUI toolkit will only succeed if
- It runs on both Windows *Nix platforms without restrictions
- It can be easely installed by grandpa and grandma
- There is a good GUI form
Hi, I am playing around with NUnit in Mono and I have some problems. I
downloaded NUnit for Mono from the NUUnit home page. The first wierd
thing happens when I run NUnit tests:
//
bash-2.05b$ mono nunit-console.exe
Below...
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 02:44, Marcus wrote:
On Thursday 08 April 2004 1:31 am, Michael J. Ryan wrote:
Also have to mention that GTK# can be used on the windows
side.
You have things slightly confused.
First Qt was bad because it wasn't GPL.
It wasn't bad because it wasn't GPL.
What license does GTK fall under?
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
I got mono from red-carpet, and I'm wondering about a few things.
o When I run monodoc and look at the docs for GnomeDb.Application, I get
this:
An error occured while loading type information: File 'gnomedb-sharp'
not
found.
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 14:28, Thomas R. Corbin wrote:
I got mono from red-carpet, and I'm wondering about a few things.
o When I run monodoc and look at the docs for GnomeDb.Application, I get
this:
An error occured while loading type information: File
It falls under the LGPL
Jeff
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 07:33, Timothy Parez wrote:
What license does GTK fall under?
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
If someone would actually take the time, Qt# can be used to write good
applications.
Then take the time. If you find any bugs in mono that keep Qt# from working,
we'll gladly accept your patches.
-- Dan
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 09:33, Dan Winship wrote:
If someone would actually take the time, Qt# can be used to write good
applications.
Then take the time. If you find any bugs in mono that keep Qt# from working,
we'll gladly accept your patches.
...and bug reports
Jeff
-- Dan
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 08:16, Soeren wrote:
I can't find a gnomedb-sharp.dll on my system. Am I supposed to?
Its not in the gtk-sharp rpm, but you can find it in the
gtk-sharp tarball. GnomeDb is a compile option thats not
on by default. Gda (Gnome Data Access) is not included
in
Inline...
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 21:59, Jonathan Pryor wrote:
Below...
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 15:15, Thomas R. Corbin wrote:
I've been using this tool in python:
http://www.python.org/doc/2.3/lib/module-optparse.html
And wondered if there was a similar tool in C# or for mono.
On Wednesday April 07, 2004 08:59 pm, Jonathan Pryor wrote:
Below...
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 15:15, Thomas R. Corbin wrote:
I've been using this tool in python:
http://www.python.org/doc/2.3/lib/module-optparse.html
And wondered if there was a similar tool in C# or for mono.
There's a
On Thursday April 08, 2004 10:53 am, Mike Kestner wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 08:16, Soeren wrote:
I can't find a gnomedb-sharp.dll on my system. Am I supposed to?
Its not in the gtk-sharp rpm, but you can find it in the
gtk-sharp tarball. GnomeDb is a compile option thats not
on
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 09:09, Thomas R. Corbin wrote:
On Thursday April 08, 2004 10:53 am, Mike Kestner wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 08:16, Soeren wrote:
I can't find a gnomedb-sharp.dll on my system. Am I supposed to?
Its not in the gtk-sharp rpm, but you can find it in the
my problem with gtk# personally is that mac os x is not supported.
although you can find people who hacked it together, if you co it
from cvs, and install it, the samples don't work. i don't have a linux
box, only a mac, and i would love to play with mono on it, but it's
been two months now,
Hi Sebastie,
Is it possible that we can speicfy the location where we want to
create the trust store.
SUnil.
Sebastien Pouliot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/8/2004 2:50:22 PM
Hello Sunil,
All user certificate stores are located under
~/.mono/certs/
The trusted store is
~/.mono/certs/Trust/
But
Does xsp support web services? I am running xsp 0.9 and I get back an
error indicating the asmx file is not found:
Not Found
The requested URL /ConfigFiles.asmx was not found on this server.
aspx and html files serve up fine.
-Chris
___
Mono-list
is output caching borked? It seems to ignore VaryByParam=*.
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Hello,
Grudgingly, I have to agree with above statement(s). Mono support for
Mac OS X/ PPC is fragile at best. I even tried to put together a page
on the basic steps (
http://homepage.mac.com/griffincaprio/mono/RunningMonoOnMacOSX.html ),
but I have all but given up trying to maintain
Hello,
Down the road you may be able to run gtk-sharp on Mac or Windows, or run
Windows.Forms on *nix and Mac, but I would not recommend that, since
- Gtk is the native UI platform for *nix
- Windows.Forms is the native UI platform for Windows
- and, Cocoa is the native UI platform for Mac
I know that WinForms issues have been dealt with on this list before,
but I was unable to find this one addressed.
I am using the Debian packages of Mono 0.31; the libwine package is also
installed. mcs has no problem compiling a simple WinForms app that uses
MessageBox.Show.
When I first ran
About xsp: you need to patch
mcs/class/System.Web/System.Web.Configuration/WebConfigurationSettings.cs
Remove the throw exception when both web.config and Web.config are present.
Other then that it should work. (with mint and --with-gc=boehm).
- Urs
-Original Message-
From: Attila
Hi
You should ask this in:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or ask in a freenode IRC server, #debian-mono
I think it's a bug, but please, talk with us about this.
Thanks!
El jue, 08-04-2004 a las 21:53, David Wright escribió:
I know that WinForms issues have been dealt with on this list before,
but I
Yes, Mono on MacOS X is not ready. We will have a proper announcement
when it is ready for consumption.
We are aware of the bugs, and the problems on the engine, you will do
yourself a service by just waiting at this point, trying to compile
Mono
on MacOS is only frustrating at this time.
I wish
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 15:12, Joseph Bennie wrote:
Respect.
We've all been there at some point.
Don't get me started on GUI's' i don't have the time either.
Yes i could learn QT or GTK or even one of the alternatives but i
really believe that the secret to GUI development with mono is
Sadly, I must agree. The mono team have made excellent progress on bringing PPC into
the JIT era but.
On a whim, I decided to install fedora core 1 and build mono. It built and installed
without incident. Truly remarkable. I must say that I was impressed. XSP kept
crashing, but that
40 matches
Mail list logo
