I've no idea where Novell host moonlight packages, but moonlight was
targeting Silverlight 4. If you can find the old builds from May 2011
you'll have the most likely chance of it working. However do bear in mind
that full support for SL 4 was never completed.
Alan
On 31 October 2011 22:29, Abe
I am running fedora-core 13 x86_64 with the following mono rpms
gnu-free-mono-fonts-20090104-12.fc13.noarch
mono-wcf-2.6.4-1.fc13.x86_64
mono-extras-2.6.4-1.fc13.x86_64
mono-basic-devel-2.6.2-1.fc13.x86_64
liberation-mono-fonts-1.06.0.20100721-1.fc13.noarch
You need moonlight, not mono.
http://www.go-mono.com/moonlight/
-Abe
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:50 PM, blueridge rcbl...@gmail.com wrote:
I am running fedora-core 13 x86_64 with the following mono rpms
gnu-free-mono-fonts-20090104-12.fc13.noarch
mono-wcf-2.6.4-1.fc13.x86_64
I have down loaded and installed the latest stable moonlight plug-in
Novell moonlight 2.4.1.
On reboot of firefox 3.6.17, the preference are greyed out, so they cannot be
set and the web
page does not display properly.
Any suggestions?
Chip
On 10/31/2011 04:53 PM, Abe Gillespie wrote:
When I go to the error console I get lots of waring messages such as
Unknown property zoom. Declaration dropped.
It then give a web site that ends .css
Any Ideas?
Should I remove the mono rpms?
Chip
On 10/31/2011 04:53 PM, Abe Gillespie wrote:
You need moonlight, not mono.
The mono RPMs shouldn't interfere with moonlight. But remove them if
you want. What's most likely going on is this is a Silverlight 4.0
site where, IIRC, moonlight only supports up to 3.0. If that's the
case then you're pretty much dead in the water.
Can someone confirm the versions?
-Abe
How would I confirm the versions?
Chip
On 10/31/2011 05:35 PM, Abe Gillespie wrote:
The mono RPMs shouldn't interfere with moonlight. But remove them if
you want. What's most likely going on is this is a Silverlight 4.0
site where, IIRC, moonlight only supports up to 3.0. If that's the
I was asking the Mono team if they could confirm what version of SL
that moonlight can run. I'm quite certain it's = 3.0. As for
ritzpix, short of downloading the xap, unzipping it and inspecting the
assemblies (or manifest, the version may be in there), I don't believe
there's any direct way to
