Re: [Mono-list] Mono: Post 1.0 plans and development update.

2004-07-16 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, I use mono essencially to make WebApplications, and i can't seen new good features in that area. For example the XSP sucks. We cannot use this kind of server in a production environment and i think this component should evolute for this server work as iqual as IIS. We have

Re: [Mono-list] Mono: Post 1.0 plans and development update.

2004-07-16 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello, There are a number of areas in which we are focusing for the Mono 1.2 release: Is a working/bulletproof implementation of AppDomain.Unload on the radar for 1.2? Is it likely to make it back into the 1.0 branch, since it would be a bugfix in a sense? That is an

Re: [Mono-list] Mono: Post 1.0 plans and development update.

2004-07-16 Thread David Waite
I have always run into pretty fundamental problems while trying to port my ASP.NET apps over to run on xsp. Much to the credit of gonzalo, these issues have usually been fixed very quickly (and I've supplied a patch or two as well), but I've always run out of time before I could get my app

Re: [Mono-list] Mono: Post 1.0 plans and development update.

2004-07-16 Thread John Luke
I don't know why I am asking about this, but wasn't there a plan for smaller ECMA profiles for things like mobile devices? When I attended a .NET user group meeting a few months ago this seemed to be a major point of interest among the existing .NET users there. Forgive me if I missed an obvious

Re: [Mono-list] Mono: Post 1.0 plans and development update.

2004-07-16 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello! I don't know why I am asking about this, but wasn't there a plan for smaller ECMA profiles for things like mobile devices? When I attended a .NET user group meeting a few months ago this seemed to be a major point of interest among the existing .NET users there. Forgive me if I

Re: [Mono-list] Mono: Post 1.0 plans and development update.

2004-07-16 Thread Matt Raffel
Just a small request plz. Dont CC the mailing list, put the mailing list address in the TO field so that people's filters work correctly. If you need to CC someone, CC a person not the mailing list. On Friday 16 July 2004 18:46, Miguel de Icaza wrote: Hello! I don't know why I am

Re: [Mono-list] Mono: Post 1.0 plans and development update.

2004-07-15 Thread Igor Georgiev
Paulo Aboim Pinto wrote: I use mono essencially to make WebApplications, and i can't seen new good features in that area. Most importanat feature for ASP.NET in my opinion is 2.0's Client Callback Feature. For example the XSP sucks. We cannot use this kind of server in a production

Re: [Mono-list] Mono: Post 1.0 plans and development update.

2004-07-15 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hey! What about ADO.NET ? I forgot about ADO.NET, am sorry about that. A couple of developers from Novell are also working on the new System.Data from the 2.x tree as well as maintaining the 1.x tree. Am sure I forgot other bits as well, I apologize in advance. Miguel

Re: [Mono-list] Mono: Post 1.0 plans and development update.

2004-07-15 Thread A Rafael D Teixeira
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 03:04, Igor Georgiev wrote: Most importanat feature for ASP.NET in my opinion is 2.0's Client Callback Feature. Yes, finally they implemented that useful feature, something I already implemented 4 years ago in my XML/XSLT web framework written in ASP/VB6. For those not

Re: [Mono-list] Mono: Post 1.0 plans and development update.

2004-07-15 Thread Stuart Ballard
Miguel de Icaza wrote: There are a number of areas in which we are focusing for the Mono 1.2 release: Is a working/bulletproof implementation of AppDomain.Unload on the radar for 1.2? Is it likely to make it back into the 1.0 branch, since it would be a bugfix in a sense?

Re: [Mono-list] Mono: Post 1.0 plans and development update.

2004-07-14 Thread Paulo Aboim Pinto
Hello I've read all the new feature and i think that is a very promissing work you have ahead. I think that WinForms is important and must be a goal if you can implement it. I use mono essencially to make WebApplications, and i can't seen new good features in that area. For example the XSP