Hi guys
This mail is not mono related, but it is .Net related. The reason why I'm
mailing you guys is that you probably know better than any of the Microsoft
consultants we have here in this place and I'm sure you won't ask me $2000
just so I could ask you a question.
We put down a single
Look over here:
http://www.gnome.org/~seth/blog/mono
and here:
http://www.osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=7094
This is bad news :(
How do you convince somebody to programming in Mono if he already read
that news?
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL
I might make sense to move the samples into the mono_doc system. That
way even newbes can read them without the need for them to go learn
some CVS commands. It would also be easier to dig around those samples
and get a feel for how far Mono is when these samples would be
available on the web.
I think one of the greatest barriers to adoption of mono by influential
developers will always be the MS issue. Miguel has explained the legal
situation over and over, but there are some linux users who will argue over
the smallest detail wherever MS is concerned with a technology.
It is
On dj, 2004-05-20 at 06:43, Jeffrey McManus wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm trying to see if I can use Mono to write an app that consumes the SOAP
API provided by my employer. I'm not having any luck. After trying
unsuccessfully to use mcs to compile a command-line C# app originally
written with
http://primates.ximian.com/~miguel//texts/cli-plugins.html
tor 2004-05-20 klockan 03.14 skrev Pablo Fischer:
Hi!
I would like to have some comments and suggestions about a issue.
I am working in a Blog Client (mbloggy) that will work ONLY in SOAP (NO
XMLRPC) for different CMS and Blogs
hi...
This is regarding the System.Xml.Schema namespace. The current implementation of XmlSchema class gives an exception in the Read(XmlTextReader, ValidationEventHandler) method when the parsed XmlTextReader refers to a xml schema with the xsd namespace other than
Tell me again:
Why doesn't Novell/Ximian contact Microsoft to get it on paper that Mono
_is_ safe?
(and if Microsoft refuses, can we actually be sure it is safe?)
- Simon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think one of the greatest barriers to adoption of mono by influential
developers will always be
Hi,
I would use this approach:
1) you must have a plug-in Interface defined, that each plug-in must
implement
2) when the application starts, use static System.IO.Directory.GetFiles()
method to get the names of assemblies in the plug-in directory
3) for each plug-in-assembly file call static
On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 11:01, Mahen Perera wrote:
hi...
This is regarding the System.Xml.Schema namespace. The current
implementation of XmlSchema class gives an exception in the
Read(XmlTextReader, ValidationEventHandler) method when the parsed
XmlTextReader refers to a xml schema with the
Thankx for the reply. I appreciate it.
On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 17:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some information...
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/4557
Miguel and Novell legal staff are currently conducting a formal patent review
of mono, and the team had already split up the components
After reading through the blog post, it sounds more like Red Hat
posturing than a real problem as well. Red Hat and Novell are entering
a seriously competitive stage in their businesses, and view each other
as strong competitors. There is a need right now to minimize the
impact of Mono by
(please excuse me if this message is a duplicate)
Scott, how did you install the Boehm GC? From the ports collection or a
more recent version?
And what does ldconfig -r |grep lgc output?
Victor
Scott Muc wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 18:09, Scott Muc wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 08:56, Paolo Molaro
See, that's what I don't quite get yet - the RAND business. If they decide
that $1000 is reasonable, what will open source projects do then? Very few
would be able to pay that. I am using mono and am very excited by it, but I
just don't quite understand this issue.
RAND +
Hello,
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/4557
Miguel and Novell legal staff are currently conducting a formal patent review
of mono, and the team had already split up the components of mono into
separate ECMA-based and non-ECMA components (WinForms, ADO.NET, etc) to
clearly define what
On Thursday May 20, 2004 12:41 pm, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
See, that's what I don't quite get yet - the RAND business. If they
decide that $1000 is reasonable, what will open source projects do then?
Very few would be able to pay that. I am using mono and am very
excited by it,
Look over here:
http://www.gnome.org/~seth/blog/mono
and here:
http://www.osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=7094
This is bad news :(
No, it is not bad news. It is fear mongering.
Here is -another- reply:
http://primates.ximian.com/~miguel/archive/2004/May-20.html
Miguel
On Thursday May 20, 2004 12:46 pm, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
Look over here:
http://www.gnome.org/~seth/blog/mono
and here:
http://www.osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=7094
This is bad news :(
No, it is not bad news. It is fear mongering.
Here is -another- reply:
Hi all,
Sorry if this is not the right place to ask this question
I am a newbie to mono and .NET..in fact I don't know much about ASP.NET. I
have a doubt which really annoys me.
Why is it a must to keep the asp.net pages in a so-called 'application'? I
don't really understand what's meant
There is a patch in CVS for mod_mono to work with multiple virtual hosts. I
have not tested it out yet so I cannot give you any pointers on using it.
As far as the application goes, each ASP.NET page does not have to be part
of an application. They can be served up in the same way php and perl
1. Applications define appdomain boundaries - each application runs in a
separate appdomain so that the types it uses are kept separate from other
applications running within the same process (mod-mono-server.exe and under
MS.NET: aspnet_wp.exe).
2. It is possible to extend mod-mono-server.exe to
Hi
The MS.NET XmlSerializer should cache the assemblies it generates, but
it seems that in some scenarios it does not. I don't have an answer for
this, the only thing I can say is that in Mono we always cache the
assemblies. You could also try to cache the XmlSerializer instances
yourself.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Easton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 12:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Mono-list] RE: Is it Mono safe?
While there's a strong urge for Linuxites to dislike any
technology that's related to MS, real developers should
On May 20, 2004, at 12:52 PM, Christopher McGinnis wrote:
[...snip...]
I would have to whole heartedly agree. Good technology is good
technology
no mater where it comes from.
Would you have accepted a technology that, say, reduced processor heat
by 2 orders of magnitude (whatever) from, say,
MC,
Why is it a must to keep the asp.net pages in a so-called 'application'? I
don't really understand what's meant by an application exactly...coz I am
used to writing php/perl CGIs, and seems that they don't have such
concept.
Here's a few short reasons that the application paradigm makes
On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 13:50 -0700, Rick Kitts wrote:
On May 20, 2004, at 12:52 PM, Christopher McGinnis wrote:
[...snip...]
I would have to whole heartedly agree. Good technology is good
technology
no mater where it comes from.
Would you have accepted a technology that, say,
Oh heck, just bundle mono ecma and tools with gnome and see if red hat
changes their tune. ;-)
-Dan
Miguel de Icaza writes:
Look over here:
http://www.gnome.org/~seth/blog/mono
and here:
http://www.osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=7094
This is bad news :(
No, it is not bad news. It is
Oh heck, just bundle mono ecma and tools with gnome and see if red hat
changes their tune. ;-)
We already did (and they could do it just as well).
Miguel
-Dan
Miguel de Icaza writes:
Look over here:
http://www.gnome.org/~seth/blog/mono
and here:
Hello
Sorry for a very basic question...
Is there a simple fix for this? I get the below error during ./configure
of mono-gtk# or pygtk (or anything else that needs GTK+ 2.0)
error---
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking for GLIB - version = 2.2.0... no
*** Could not run GLIB
Hi there!
I'm trying to write a Mono wrapper for GPGME (GnuPG Made Easy, an
application wrapper to GPG).
It's becoming wrapper around wrapper around wrapper, but what the
heck... ;-)
Of course, I'm using InteropServices to interact with a C library. I
made a few wrapper functions in the
In the end, the 'Microsoft may attempt to screw Linux users over' is
not the real issue, but a distraction point to help carry FUD of this
sort. Patent issues are not restricted to a particular vendor or
product; there are several other open-source and free-software projects
which may very
On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 09:42, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
Just for the record, the name is not `polio' or `cholera', its either
`poly' or `color', but the opposite of Mono (poly=many, mono=single;
color vs single color) ;-)
What about stereo?
--
Shahms King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On May 20, 2004, at 2:03 PM, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 13:50 -0700, Rick Kitts wrote:
On May 20, 2004, at 12:52 PM, Christopher McGinnis wrote:
[...snip...]
I would have to whole heartedly agree. Good technology is good
technology
no mater where it comes from.
Would you have
El jue, 20-05-2004 a las 07:24, Peter Foley escribió:
I have got a helloworld app running on my Fedora 1 box with Mono beta 1 (yay!)
How do I get a web service running
Under .Net I have helloworld.asmx and helloworld.asmx.cs which compiles to
bin/helloworld.dll
I browse to
You can even go so far as to use the same dll compiled in Visual Studio. I
did it for a service I already had running and it has been working
flawlessly.
Christopher McGinnis
Neopets Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalo Paniagua Javier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May
On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 08:16, Victor Jalencas wrote:
(please excuse me if this message is a duplicate)
Scott, how did you install the Boehm GC? From the ports collection or a
more recent version?
And what does ldconfig -r |grep lgc output?
Hi Victor,
I've tried installing straight from
Hi there,
I uploaded a windows installer with current mono/mcs to
http://primates.ximian.com/~gonzalo/mono/blog/files/mono-0.91.99-win32-3.exe
-Gonzalo
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Submitted as #58777. Thanks!
-J.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lluis Sanchez
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 2:39 AM
To: Jeffrey McManus
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mono-list] mono wsdl.exe gags on eBay SOAP WSDL
On dj,
Rick Kitts wrote:
On May 20, 2004, at 2:03 PM, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
you are confusing the issue. it's not the idea that can limit your
freedom, it's the implementation that can.
that said, your concerns becomes moot.
I'm sorry but I don't understand what you're saying.
The processor heat
-Original Message-
From: Rick Kitts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 4:11 PM
To: Jeffrey Stedfast
Cc: Christopher McGinnis; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mono-list] RE: Is it Mono safe?
On May 20, 2004, at 2:03 PM, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Thu,
try looking at
http://nprof.sourceforge.net/
Quoting Álex López García [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I would like to get the summary of namespaces, classes, interfaces,
methods and members being used in my code.
Is there a tool I can use to get that information?
I want to compare that
Is your SetHandler directive set correctly?
Regards,
Mark.
Quoting Tracy Barlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ASP simply does not work. There are no error messages, Mozilla simply
reports that the file is of type application/x-asp-net and that it does
not know what to do with it.
--
I really have not been at all clear. I apologize. I don't care if MSFT
tries to kill Mono. I don't think it can. I don't care of MSFT tries to
kill Linux. I don't think it can.
MSFT realizes it's advantages through it's ubiquity. It maintains it's
ubiquity through unfair means. Hiding APIs,
43 matches
Mail list logo
