Hello,
I have just committed some changes to our build system. We now build
libraries for each profile into their own directory class/lib/$(PROFILE)
so that we can build all the profiles libraries at once without them
overwriting each other. Since this is such a large change there may be
i
Hi,
Apparently the Mono build is broken on Windows :
Making all in runtime
make[2]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/d/cvs/mono/mono/runtime'
cp -f /usr/local/lib/Mono.CSharp.Debugger.dll .
cp: cannot stat `/usr/local/lib/Mono.CSharp.Debugger.dll': No such file or
directory
make[2]: *** [Mono.CSharp
I do not think you understood what I wrote, because we pretty much
agree on most things.
My list of ways in which Microsoft won was not comprehensive.
The way I interpreted was that you were saying that Microsofts
anti-competitive strategies is what primarily put them ahead. If I
misunderst
On Mon, 2004-26-04 at 17:37 -0400, Ben Maurer wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 17:23, John Luke wrote:
> > This may or may not be want you want, but there is SharpAssembly that is
> > included with SharpDevelop and MonoDevelop for reading assemblies.
>
> S.A. is a layer on top of MS's unmanaged API.
On Mon, 2004-26-04 at 17:37 -0400, Ben Maurer wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 17:23, John Luke wrote:
> > This may or may not be want you want, but there is SharpAssembly that is
> > included with SharpDevelop and MonoDevelop for reading assemblies.
>
> S.A. is a layer on top of MS's unmanaged API.
Hello!
> >We are only nine weeks from Mono 1.0, and now is a perfect time to
> > start documenting some classes using Monodoc if you have some spare
> > time.
>
> Only 21,118 things left to document in corlib! (This is the number of
> occurences of "To be added" in the corlib XML files, wh
Miguel de Icaza wrote:
We are only nine weeks from Mono 1.0, and now is a perfect time to
start documenting some classes using Monodoc if you have some spare
time.
Only 21,118 things left to document in corlib! (This is the number of
occurences of "To be added" in the corlib XML files, which
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've heard this argument before, and I'm not convinced. Even disregarding howdeeply integrated media player and messenger are from a technical point ofview,
Obviously it cant be that hard to produce a version of Explorer and
Media Player for other operating systems, Mi
Hello!
We are only nine weeks from Mono 1.0, and now is a perfect time to
start documenting some classes using Monodoc if you have some spare
time.
Miguel.
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-li
On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 17:23, John Luke wrote:
> This may or may not be want you want, but there is SharpAssembly that is
> included with SharpDevelop and MonoDevelop for reading assemblies.
S.A. is a layer on top of MS's unmanaged API. So, it wont really work
(at least not for IL bodies) on mono.
On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 14:08 -0700, Jackson Harper wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Currently PERWAPI seems to be unfinished/unreleased and has been for
> some time. If you are willing to do some work Mono.PEToolkit
> (mcs/class/Mono.PEToolkit) actually does what you would need, but will
> need a little A
Hello,
Currently PERWAPI seems to be unfinished/unreleased and has been for
some time. If you are willing to do some work Mono.PEToolkit
(mcs/class/Mono.PEToolkit) actually does what you would need, but will
need a little API love to make it work the way you want. Also look at
the command
I am trying to set up multiple virtual hosts on Apache 2.0.49.
Each of which of course has its own physical root directory. Trouble is the
MonoApplications line only takes virtual directory paths. Running
mod-mono-server.exe and looking at the argument syntax doesn’t help. How
can I hav
Hey guys,
This latest discussion that started off of Miguel’s
blog should be spent on a discussion group for that purpose. Let’s stick
with the Mono discussion on this mailing list.
Fascinating content, but not relevant to the list.
>Legally, they can't implement virus protection. They have a contract with
the major AV companies saying they won't. This is also the reason why their
new firewall isn't as good as the other ones out there.
That unto itself is just terrible. I mean how intrinsic should it be to
protect the OS b
Legally, they can't implement virus protection. They have a contract with
the major AV companies saying they won't. This is also the reason why their
new firewall isn't as good as the other ones out there.
Most of the time, users don't care what is on their computer. Only us savvy
ones do :).
I'm looking for any kind of C# API for reading IL assemblies and
introspecting on the contents of the methods. I don't need to go as far
as getting all the information to produce dissassembled ilasm source
code, but that's a superset of my needs: if someone had produced a
managed disassembler,
Right to innovate? That's so played out. They can innovate those
applications apart from the OS and compete on an even playing field if they
choose to, but they choose not to do so.
The idea that MS will never be able to sell another version of windows
without them being able to "innovate" buil
Quoting Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >I disagree with that statement, most notably about the art of
> anti-competitive strategy by bundling Messenger and Media Player.
>
> Robert,
> Like you, I don't mind that IE, Messenger and Media Player can be on
> windows pc's as "choices", what bothers
Hello my friends, my boss force me to run mono-gtk-sharp programs on win98, something has some formule to do it.
THANKS...
Consigue tu correo GRATIS en Manizales.com,
dale vida a tus mensajes con más de 300 motivos gráficos.
Busca el portal de tu ciudad en http://66.216.122.105
>I disagree with that statement, most notably about the art of
anti-competitive strategy by bundling Messenger and Media Player.
Robert,
Like you, I don't mind that IE, Messenger and Media Player can be on
windows pc's as "choices", what bothers me is when microsoft can dictate to
OEM's t
> I wrote a blog response to Miguel and corrected some statements and
> added my own insight being as tho I was active back then. This is in
> no way a invitation for a flame war and is not inteded to be abusive or
> disrespectful to Miguel. Enjoy if you decide to read it.
I do not think yo
On 04/23/04 Sebastien Pouliot wrote:
> Here's the patches. There may be a better way on Linux to get a version...
>
> The following code...
>
> static void Main(string[] args)
> {
> Console.WriteLine (Environment.OSVersion.ToString ());
> Console.WriteLine (Environment.OSVersion.Platf
On 04/26/04 tapia wrote:
> I've been testing mono in a powerpc box. It compiles fine, both mono and
> gtk#. But when trying to execute a gtk# sample, the mono process get
> zombie. This is the dmesg output:
>
> (...)
> Oops: kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
> NIP: C00092D8 LR: C007BEC4 SP:
On 04/23/04 HannibAl Bundie wrote:
> I need a high definition clock but unfortunately, that which I used on
> windows (QueryPerformanceCounter / QueryPerformanceFrequency) is dependent
> on this OS.
> So is there an alternative (in Mono.Posix or other stuff like this) to
> QueryPerformance ?
O
El lun, 26-04-2004 a las 08:57, Michael escribió:
> >> But my question is there any logging implemented with xsp or
> >> mod-mono-server? As far as I've figured out, you can run it with -v
> >> manually (don't know about the new mod_mono-0.9 and .12 auto launch
> >> method) and dump it to a text fi
Hi.
I've been testing mono in a powerpc box. It compiles fine, both mono and
gtk#. But when trying to execute a gtk# sample, the mono process get
zombie. This is the dmesg output:
(...)
Oops: kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
NIP: C00092D8 LR: C007BEC4 SP: E375FCC0 REGS: e375fc10 TRAP: 0301
http://www.greatestjournal.com/users/techrjdohnert/
I wrote a blog response to Miguel and corrected some statements and
added my own insight being as tho I was active back then. This is in
no way a invitation for a flame war and is not inteded to be abusive or
disrespectful to Miguel. Enjoy
On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 07:41, Peter Ertel wrote:
> ./.libs/libmint.so: undefined reference to `string_invariant_tolower'
> ./.libs/libmint.so: undefined reference to `string_invariant_toupper'
For some reason these functions are not implemented in mono like the
other string_invariant_ functions are
Thanks for your answer.
Unfortunately, I don't think GetTickCount is enough for my application.
Nevertheless, I'm ok to try with this function. But, if I'm not wrong,
GetTickCount is also dependent of windows because it needs kernel32 ?
I'm a newbie in C# and particulary in Mono. So, if you have
Hello,
You need to reference System.Drawing.dll and System.Windows.Forms.dll
while compiling your program, like this,
$ mcs -r:System.Drawing -r:System.Windows.Forms
HTH
>>> npguy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 4/26/2004 12:12:31 PM >>>
Hi,
I am getting err message --
Cannot find type `System.Windows.Fo
31 matches
Mail list logo
