Paulo Aboim Pinto wrote:
I use mono essencially to make WebApplications, and i can't seen new
good features in that area.
Most importanat feature for ASP.NET in my opinion is
2.0's Client Callback Feature.
For example the XSP sucks. We cannot use
this kind of server in a production
Good day people!
In order to compile PocketPC .NET binaries using Mono 1.0, I can extract
and rename the .NET dlls from the Compact
Framework's .cab for ARM and compile with /nostdlib using the procedure
documented at:
- http://dotnetdn.com/without-visual-studio/
-
Hello,
I've installed the latest mono1.0 monodevelop on redhat 9.0.
What about mono debugger ? I don't seem to have it, or have I not enabled it ? Is it integrated with mono develop.
If not, could you guide me on how I can get a latest version of monodebugger, to get going with my
I fellows,
as I said in object I'm trying to understand pros and cons of using XSP
instead of mod_mono.
--
T.I.
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Hi,
Well I might
be passing all but two regression tests with my S390 JIT now, but when I try and
use it to build mcs I don't get passed the first compile!!
Unhandled Exception: System.ArgumentOutOfRangeException: Index is less
than 0 or more than or equal to the list count.Parameter name:
Hello,
I'm not sure it has got integrated with MonoDevelop (MD) or not, but
MD
guys have planned that.
You can get debugger from cvs. Module name is 'debugger'. Once you
install
it, you can use 'mdb' command to run it.
-Ravi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/14/2004 2:48:39 PM
Hello,
I've installed the
Hi,
I noticed that the latest cygwin setup enables you to install
glib/gtk/atk/pango in your machine. However, with it I could
not build mono runtime (monoburg got frozen). I haven't checked
in depth, but it is likely to happen; maybe they are based on
cygwin1.dll, while mono expects windows
Hi there,
I am learning mono and its
installation
I have installed mono on windows and able to
compile run the programs using mcs and mono
now where i am facing problem is
installing gtk# on windows
runing mod_mono on windows for asp.net
installing mono runtime and framework on
linux
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 19:53, Fresnay Pascal wrote:
make sure that you used /usr prefix with configure
in Monodevelop
add a gst-sharp.dll reference to your project
(gac/gst-sharp/XXXddsiqdsqo/gst-sharp.dll)\
Thats where I am having the problem. I can right click on the references
and select
One Tip:
I was trying to use gmcs (ALPHA SOFTWARE: Mono C# Compiler 0.96.0.0 for
Generics), I had get this results:
gmcs -t:winexe /noconfig /nostdlib -r:mscorlib.dll -r:system.dll -r:
system.windows.forms.dll -r:system.drawing.dll -L libs gui.cs
ALPHA SOFTWARE: Mono C# Compiler 0.96.0.0 for
Hey!
What about ADO.NET ?
I forgot about ADO.NET, am sorry about that. A couple of developers from
Novell are also working on the new System.Data from the 2.x tree as well
as maintaining the 1.x tree.
Am sure I forgot other bits as well, I apologize in advance.
Miguel
I have pointed to it, already for a year, but I think, I now ask again, what
you think, about a better integration of mono in the system.
Have a look at MS-Windows and .NET:
To run there a .NET program, called program.exe you only need to type
program in the console. Thats the same like running
Request.IsSecureConnection always return FALSE !!!
public sealed class HttpRequest {
.
private HttpWorkerRequest _WorkerRequest;
.
public bool IsSecureConnection {
get {
if (null != _WorkerRequest) {
return
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 03:04, Igor Georgiev wrote:
Most importanat feature for ASP.NET in my opinion is
2.0's Client Callback Feature.
Yes, finally they implemented that useful feature, something I already
implemented 4 years ago in my XML/XSLT web framework written in ASP/VB6.
For those not
As I understand it, XSP is quite self contained as it doesn't need an
HTTP server as it provides that functionality too. However fronting XSP
with Apache (and such using mod_mono as the bridge) gives you all the
power and control (and better HTTP performance) of a renown http
server. XSP is
Rohit,
as you can see at the bottom of
http://www.mono-project.com/contributing/asp-net.html , mod_mono does
not currently work on Microsoft Windows.
As for GTK# on Windows, you can find a combined Mono/GTK# installer at
http://forge.novell.com/modules/xfmod/project/?prj2make-sharp
(Francisco
Title: RE: [Mono-list] missing native feel ?
-Original Message-
From: Freddy BL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 7:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Mono-list] missing native feel ?
I have pointed to it, already for a year, but I think, I now
Hi,
I have installed mono with red-carpet, which created the gac directory
under /usr/lib/mono. And I built monodoc from cvs ,which created a gac
directory under /usr/local/lib/mono.
I get an error that monodoc isn't found When I try to run monodoc, which
makes sense since it is in the other gac.
Hi,
The implementation of tailc is quite x86-centric in mini.c. It assumes that all
parameters are on the stack and by simply going back to the previous stack frame then
the jump to the new routine will have access to the parameters that it wants. For
architectures where parameters can be in
That is, what I mean, with best integration in the system, so
that there
existing a native-feeling by using .net-programs.
The problem with giving it a native feel is that it destroys one of the
objectives of Mono...to be able to take a .Net program from Windows and
just run it.
Why so?
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 11:27, Gert Kello wrote:
That is, what I mean, with best integration in the system, so
that there
existing a native-feeling by using .net-programs.
The problem with giving it a native feel is that it destroys one of the
objectives of Mono...to be able
Hi Jasper,
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 12:07, jasper van putten wrote:
I have installed mono with red-carpet, which created the gac directory
under /usr/lib/mono. And I built monodoc from cvs ,which created a gac
directory under /usr/local/lib/mono.
Before building monodoc from sources configure to
That is, what I mean, with best integration in the system, so
that there
existing a native-feeling by using .net-programs.
The problem with giving it a native feel is that it destroys one of
the
objectives of Mono...to be able to take a .Net program from Windows and
just
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 13:34, Andrew Arnott wrote:
That is, what I mean, with best integration in the system, so
that there
existing a native-feeling by using .net-programs.
The problem with giving it a native feel is that it destroys one of
the
objectives of
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 13:38, Thomas R. Corbin wrote:
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 13:34, Andrew Arnott wrote:
That is, what I mean, with best integration in the system, so
that there
existing a native-feeling by using .net-programs.
The problem with giving it a native
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 14:09, MET wrote:
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 13:38, Thomas R. Corbin wrote:
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 13:34, Andrew Arnott wrote:
That is, what I mean, with best integration in the system, so
that there
existing a native-feeling by using .net-programs.
But the spirit of the CLI is to have exactly one run anywhere. Why would
we
want to segregate formats? Only (perhaps) to push the Linux agenda
forward
by releasing software that runs only on Free Software (mono for windows
and
linux).
Let me tell you: when I compiled hello, world using csc
Hi,
I've been trying to use gst-sharp also. Checkout the samples in
gst-sharp/samples. Also the gstreamer development manual is very
relevant and most native gstreamer examples can be easily ported to
c#.
Cheers
Adam
Hi, I have the cvs version of gst-sharp.
I did a make install, no
Humm,
that's strange. Were you able to run the samples file on XSP (no
Apache, no mod_mono) ?
Erik
On Jul 15, 2004, at 2:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik,
First of all, thanks for the help.
Ok, this morning I installed the Mono Runtime, and XSF Web Server
successfully.
I also installed mono
... then WRAP it like everything else.
I will - but isn't one reason to use computers is to get stuff
automated, to make our life easier? It would be nice if every
programmer out there didn't have to do this by hand.
No one forces you to use the .exe file ending, but doing anything
Miguel de Icaza wrote:
There are a number of areas in which we are focusing for the
Mono 1.2 release:
Is a working/bulletproof implementation of AppDomain.Unload on the radar
for 1.2? Is it likely to make it back into the 1.0 branch, since it
would be a bugfix in a sense?
I've built and
installed mod_mono for my apache2 server. When I try and get to it I'd get
Server Unavailable errors and a message in error_log:
** ERROR **: file exceptions-s390.c: line 837
(ves_icall_get_trace): assertion failed: (ji !=
NULL)aborting...
I added a
syslog call to the S/390
I should add running
mono xsp.exe works
fine.
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 14:53, Todd Berman wrote:
... then WRAP it like everything else.
I will - but isn't one reason to use computers is to get stuff
automated, to make our life easier? It would be nice if every
programmer out there didn't have to do this by hand.
No one forces
El jue, 15-07-2004 a las 15:27, Igor Georgiev escribió:
Request.IsSecureConnection always return FALSE !!!
public sealed class HttpRequest {
.
private HttpWorkerRequest _WorkerRequest;
.
public bool IsSecureConnection {
get {
if (null
El jue, 15-07-2004 a las 22:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
I've built and installed mod_mono for my apache2 server. When I try
and get to it I'd get Server Unavailable errors and a message in
error_log:
[...]
Is it possible to get the stderr output of mod_mono so I can try and
work out what
-Original Message-
Run it through apache with your configuration and get the command line
from 'ps -aux'. Kill mod-mono-server. Then run that command line as the
same user that runs apache from a console.
- I do but because it makes no socket connection I don't get the same behavior.
You
We have consolidated list of tasks to be done in different components
(ADO.NET,VB.NET,System.Drawing, testing ADO.NET) for 1.2 . It also
includes .NET 1.1 missing functionalities also. Attached document
gives
details.
We need to decide how much of .NET 2.0 will be shipped with Mono 1.2.
(Resent with ADO.NET - attachment)
We have consolidated list of tasks to be done in different components
(ADO.NET,VB.NET,System.Drawing, testing ADO.NET) for 1.2 . It also
includes .NET 1.1 missing functionalities also. Attached document
gives
details.
We need to decide how much of .NET 2.0 will
Hi. Is this a bug?
When I add the line
using Gst;
to my code, everything needs to be addressed by it's full name, ie:I
need to to Gtk.Application.Init() rather than Application.Init(), and
even my own namespaces need a full address, so I must do
MySpace.Some.Thing() rather than Some.Thing()
Hello,
I don't know what you're talking about.
A real normal user expects a start button (on every os), looks for the
correct icon, and clicks it. Even better, a shortcut exists on his desktop.
These shortcuts do not bear an extension, so I don't know what all the fuzz
is about.
The only native
41 matches
Mail list logo
