Hello David,
wx.NET is a .NET wrapper around wxWidgets, this GUI toolkit may be
good (although I think it's a bit complicated) but is not compatible
with winforms! You can use wxWidgets by simply adding a reference to
it but keep in mind that: Winforms != wxWidgets ;)
Hope that helps you to
Hi,
I am trying to download Mono source using anonymous user name. Everytime I
am getting connection refused. I want to contribute to mono development. Can
anyone guide me to check out the latest source of Mono? I tried using online
explaination to check out the sources on Mono site.
Reagrds,
Hi,
Suppose I have a lot of Mono applications, say, A.exe, B.exe, C.exe,
etc. I want to be able to start and stop these applications
independently (like regular applications) but I also want them to run
in a single Mono VM for efficiency reasons. Is this possible?
Robin
I completely agree that there has to be a Delphi compiler ...
Me too, I would love to see this project idea start to get going.
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Hi Eno,
Atsushi Eno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Okay. So I made tiny patch for jay (am so lazy to make big changes).
Attached patch for jay adds -d BlahBlah to insert #define BlahBlah
on top of the output. (It is somewhat C# specific, but users could
just ignore this option when they don't
Hi, Miguel.
We are now about ready to start sending code which is specific to our
configuration to the Mono trunc.
The code we will send will be surrounded by '#if J2EE' or '#if !J2EE'. We
will be both making additions to existing files as well as adding new files.
We would probably start with
Hello all
Attached is the test for DirectoryServices.DirectoryEntry class.
I tried to make the test self-contained as possible, but it still
assumes OpenLDAP server is up and running.
Note - for the test to run you need to change the server name in the
test body.
Additionally attached is a
Hello all
Attached is the test for DirectoryServices.DirectorySearcher class.
I tried to make the test self-contained as possible, but it still assumes
OpenLDAP server is up and running.
Note - for the test to run you need to change the server name in the test body.
Additionally attached is a
Hello all
Attached is the test for DirectoryServices.SearchResult class.
I tried to make the test self-contained as possible, but it still
assumes OpenLDAP server is up and running.
Note - for the test to run you need to change the server name in the
test body.
Additionally attached is a
Hello Boris,
Nice tests :-)
I would suggest a few things...
1. Network tests generally takes a long time to execute. Such (or most) test
in other assemblies have been given a
[Category (InetAccess)]
either on the [Test]ed method or on the class (the [TestFixture]) if all
tests requires network
Hi Marek,
Oh, what you pointed out is really important. Because if all
the contributors don't want to fix any of assemblies because of
the number of warnings, it is so important matter for all the
hackers and thus we can let people hacking on mono.
OK, I'll look into all the warnings.
Atsushi Eno
Hi all...
While I haven't looked at the code this refers to
myself, it seems to me that a lot of these warnings
are probably related to private functions put in place
to support public functionality that is not yet
implemented. Is this the case?
Marek, while we are adding new compiler warnings,
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 06:45 -0800, Kelly Leahy wrote:
Hi all...
Marek, while we are adding new compiler warnings, can
we have some way to hide the warnings on an
individual symbol basis? It seems to me that our goal
should be to get rid of all warnings one way or
another. If the
Suppose I have a lot of Mono applications, say, A.exe, B.exe,
C.exe,
etc. I want to be able to start and stop these applications
independently (like regular applications) but I also want them to
run
in a single Mono VM for efficiency reasons. Is this possible?
You could do that by
Hey!
We are actually targeting J2EE as in System.Web where we implement it over
J2EE
servlets. We could actually differenciate and use 'TARGET_JVM' for Java
related
issues and 'TARGET_J2EE' for J2EE related issues. What do you think?
That sounds like a good idea. I like it.
Miguel
Hello,
Marek, while we are adding new compiler warnings, can
we have some way to hide the warnings on an
individual symbol basis? It seems to me that our goal
should be to get rid of all warnings one way or
another. If the warning is coming up because we
haven't used a function we know we will
Hi, try this :
svn co svn://svn.myrealbox.com/source/trunk/mcs
svn co svn://svn.myrealbox.com/source/trunk/mono
svn co svn://svn.myrealbox.com/source/trunk/gtk-sharp
if it doesn't work, please describe exact error returned by svn.
Regards,
Pascal
Le jeudi 17 mars 2005 13:37 +0530, Sridhar
Hello,
Comments inline.
Marek Safar wrote:
Hello Eno,
I would like to commit my next mcs patche which improves our warning
detection.
However, same as in the first case I would like to reduce the number of
BCL warnings to acceptable level.
I am going to enable warning CS0169 and in the
Hi Hari,
Ohh, sure ;-) Will take this easy way2go.
Thanks,
Atsushi Eno
Raja R Harinath wrote:
Hi Eno,
Atsushi Eno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Okay. So I made tiny patch for jay (am so lazy to make big changes).
Attached patch for jay adds -d BlahBlah to insert #define BlahBlah
on top of the output.
Hi,
Just a heads up to say that anyone who is using gcc 4 can now build
libgdiplus happily.
Thanks Jordi :-)
TTFN
Paul
--
It is often said that something cannot be libel if it is the truth.
This has had to be amended to 'something cannot be libel if it is the
truth or if the bank balance says
I was just reading
http://news.com.com/Microsoft+walks+VB+tight+rope/2100-1007_3-5620821.html?tag=nefd.lede
It seems to me that there is no reason that there can't be a VB6
compiler that would target the CLR.
For all you budding compiler writers out there, why not give this one a
crack. It
Hi Kelly,
Thanks very much for your reply.
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:37:12 -0800 (PST), Kelly Leahy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at the documentation for this function at:
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 21:25 +1300, Ralph Mason wrote:
I was just reading
http://news.com.com/Microsoft+walks+VB+tight+rope/2100-1007_3-5620821.html?tag=nefd.lede
It seems to me that there is no reason that there can't be a VB6
compiler that would target the CLR.
For all you budding
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 11:47 +, James Fitzsimons wrote:
For instance, you could declare the P/Invoke function
to take an array of CvPoint2D32f elements, then
construct this array in the code that calls this
function (the wrapper) with the appropriate size.
Perhaps, if you know
I was just reading
http://news.com.com/Microsoft+walks+VB+tight+rope/2100-1007_3-5620821.html?tag=nefd.lede
It seems to me that there is no reason that there can't be a VB6
compiler that would target the CLR.
For all you budding compiler writers out there, why not give this one a
crack. It
Hey,
I'm not saying it can't be done -- it obviously can be. I'm just
pointing out that this is A LOT of work; don't underestimate it. A
Delphi-compatible compiler is trivial in comparison. VB6 language
support is easy, the language semantics are easy, it's the class library
support (and
VB6 was syntactically unsuited to .NET so came VB.NET, or so it was
originally laid out. The reality is, if you are mired in VB6 syntax,
go use RealBasic and target Windows, Linux Mac from the same IDE
using the same syntax and compiler. VB6 syntax on top of the Mono
.NET runtime just
Title: RE: [Mono-list] Good Mono Project
-Original Message-
From: Miguel de Icaza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 12:07 PM
To: Jonathan Pryor
Cc: Ralph Mason; Mono List
Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Good Mono Project
Hey,
I'm not saying it can't
Hello,
VB6 was syntactically unsuited to .NET so came VB.NET, or so it was
originally laid out. The reality is, if you are mired in VB6 syntax,
go use RealBasic and target Windows, Linux Mac from the same IDE
using the same syntax and compiler. VB6 syntax on top of the Mono
.NET
Hey,
I've worked in VB6 for about 8 years. VBA and VBScript might not be
too
bad, but VB6 would be a nightmare. VB6 even within itself operates
thru
COM for many of the things it does and that includes most of the
controls
that you put on a form. Moving applications would require
How would I go about having MonoDevelop color-code my .aspx pages as if
they were C# like it codes the .cs pages? I can live, but plaintext
C#/asp gets a little bland and straintive after a while.
SigmaX
___
Mono-list maillist -
hi paul,
i can indeed build it that way, however since 1.1.3 mono has simplified
support for bundles which include the program in question, along with
any and all needed mono runtimes. for fun i decided to read all the release
notes, just to see if there were any features that i had
Hi and thanks to all that helped me with this.
The final solution was:
[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)]
public struct CvPoint2D32f
{
float x; /* x-coordinate, usually zero-based */
float y; /* y-coordinate, usually zero-based */
}
[DllImport(cv)]
private unsafe static
33 matches
Mail list logo
