On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:35:34 +0100, Jonathan Stowe
Why not have an option on mcs to have the mcs wrapper create
an .exe-specific wrapper? The unix mcs script could create
a unix shell script, and the windows mcs.bat could create a
batch file.
So:
mcs -target:exe MyClass.cs
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 18:38, Thomas R. Corbin wrote:
For me, the .dll is fine, it's the .exe.
Then wrap it in a shell script just as you say do with Java programs - I
don't see what the problem is here.
/J\
___
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 22:16, Thomas R. Corbin wrote:
It would be nice if there was a standard beginning wrapper that could
be used until or unless something more advanced is needed.
Rename this to the same as your .exe file (but without the extension)
and put it in the same directory:
I know this doesn't address the original posters problem but gentoo
includes a script so you don't need to include mono when executing.
Here is a link to the file,
http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/dev-dotnet/mono/files/dotnet.init.
Setting CLR=mono and starting it at boot is good for
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:35:34 +0100, Jonathan Stowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rename this to the same as your .exe file (but without the extension)
and put it in the same directory:
#!/bin/sh
exec
I have pointed to it, already for a year, but I think, I now ask again, what
you think, about a better integration of mono in the system.
Have a look at MS-Windows and .NET:
To run there a .NET program, called program.exe you only need to type
program in the console. Thats the same like running
Title: RE: [Mono-list] missing native feel ?
-Original Message-
From: Freddy BL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 7:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Mono-list] missing native feel ?
I have pointed to it, already for a year, but I think, I now
That is, what I mean, with best integration in the system, so
that there
existing a native-feeling by using .net-programs.
The problem with giving it a native feel is that it destroys one of the
objectives of Mono...to be able to take a .Net program from Windows and
just run it.
Why so?
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 11:27, Gert Kello wrote:
That is, what I mean, with best integration in the system, so
that there
existing a native-feeling by using .net-programs.
The problem with giving it a native feel is that it destroys one of the
objectives of Mono...to be able
That is, what I mean, with best integration in the system, so
that there
existing a native-feeling by using .net-programs.
The problem with giving it a native feel is that it destroys one of
the
objectives of Mono...to be able to take a .Net program from Windows and
just
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 13:34, Andrew Arnott wrote:
That is, what I mean, with best integration in the system, so
that there
existing a native-feeling by using .net-programs.
The problem with giving it a native feel is that it destroys one of
the
objectives of
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 13:38, Thomas R. Corbin wrote:
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 13:34, Andrew Arnott wrote:
That is, what I mean, with best integration in the system, so
that there
existing a native-feeling by using .net-programs.
The problem with giving it a native
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 14:09, MET wrote:
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 13:38, Thomas R. Corbin wrote:
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 13:34, Andrew Arnott wrote:
That is, what I mean, with best integration in the system, so
that there
existing a native-feeling by using .net-programs.
But the spirit of the CLI is to have exactly one run anywhere. Why would
we
want to segregate formats? Only (perhaps) to push the Linux agenda
forward
by releasing software that runs only on Free Software (mono for windows
and
linux).
Let me tell you: when I compiled hello, world using csc
... then WRAP it like everything else.
I will - but isn't one reason to use computers is to get stuff
automated, to make our life easier? It would be nice if every
programmer out there didn't have to do this by hand.
No one forces you to use the .exe file ending, but doing anything
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 14:53, Todd Berman wrote:
... then WRAP it like everything else.
I will - but isn't one reason to use computers is to get stuff
automated, to make our life easier? It would be nice if every
programmer out there didn't have to do this by hand.
No one forces
] missing native feel ?
On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 14:53, Todd Berman wrote:
... then WRAP it like everything else.
I will - but isn't one reason to use computers is to get stuff
automated, to make our life easier? It would be nice if every
programmer out there didn't have to do
17 matches
Mail list logo
