Re: [Mono-list] rpm install

2004-07-23 Thread Duncan Mak
On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 20:41, Matt Raffel wrote: Unfortunately that doesnt seem to work. I get a dependancy error. What if I used rpm --install * --nodeps What errors are you seeing? Duncan. ___ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Mono-list] rpm install

2004-07-21 Thread Tomar
You should not ignore dependency errors. What does it claim you are missing? Tom Larsen On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 20:17, Matt Raffel wrote: On Monday 19 July 2004 20:09, Daniel Carrera wrote: On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 07:47:45PM -0400, Matt Raffel wrote: don't know what order to install them

Re: [Mono-list] rpm install

2004-07-20 Thread caner þahan
I liked this problem when installing .rpm files.This problem's solution ;must to install libgal-2.0. Install libgal-2.0 or upper version.It will be done. Caner ÞAHANMSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* ___ Mono-list maillist -

Re: [Mono-list] rpm install

2004-07-20 Thread Raúl Romero
You could use this Reposirtory for Mandrake: MadrakeLinux_Devel_Mono ftp://ftp.rediris.es/sites/carroll.cac.psu.edu/mandrakelinux/devel/cooker/contrib/i586 { hdlist: hdlist.MadrakeLinux_Devel_Mono.cz synthesis with_hdlist: synthesis.hdlist.cz } It has a RPM's packages for MDK 10 :-)

[Mono-list] rpm install

2004-07-19 Thread Matt Raffel
I've downloaded all of the rpms to install mono (on Mandrake 10). I don't know what order to install them in. So I was thinking of running rpm install like this: rpm --install * --force Is this ok? Will I have problems when this is done? Thnx Matt

Re: [Mono-list] rpm install

2004-07-19 Thread Daniel Carrera
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 07:47:45PM -0400, Matt Raffel wrote: I've downloaded all of the rpms to install mono (on Mandrake 10). I don't know what order to install them in. So I was thinking of running rpm install like this: rpm --install * --force Is this ok? Will I have problems

Re: [Mono-list] rpm install

2004-07-19 Thread Mark Gimelfarb
Just feed the list of packages to URPMI, like such: urpmi *.rpm or whatever is appropriate for your paths to RPMS. Before installing, both URPMI and RPM will look at all packages found, in order to calculate the dependencies anyway, so order isn't so important. If something is missing, you'll

Re: [Mono-list] rpm install

2004-07-19 Thread Matt Raffel
On Monday 19 July 2004 20:09, Daniel Carrera wrote: On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 07:47:45PM -0400, Matt Raffel wrote: don't know what order to install them in. So I was thinking of running rpm install like this: rpm --install * --force I generally avoid using a --force flag. I would

Re: [Mono-list] rpm install

2004-07-19 Thread Mark Gimelfarb
You most likely need to satisfy the dependency by installing the appropriate package. Even though --nodeps will get your software installed, you might no be able to run the software successfully. Tip: look at the URPMI docs for answers; it usually does a decent job of resolving dependencies

Re: [Mono-list] rpm install

2004-07-19 Thread Daniel Carrera
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 09:17:30PM -0400, Matt Raffel wrote: rpm --install * Unfortunately that doesnt seem to work. I get a dependancy error. What if I used rpm --install * --nodeps Don't do that unless you *really* know what you are doing. Since you are asking, I take it you

Re: [Mono-list] rpm install

2004-07-19 Thread Matt Raffel
On Monday 19 July 2004 22:13, Mark Gimelfarb wrote: You most likely need to satisfy the dependency by installing the appropriate package. Even though --nodeps will get your software installed, you might no be able to run the software successfully. Tip: look at the URPMI docs for answers; it