I think it's important to note that this is not a small job.  It will take
a lot of investment.  There's definitely a few of us who tried, and that's
where a lot of the MVC5 code came from.

I for one would love this to happen, it would make my life a lot better
(who loves web hosting on windows?).

The best bet is to choose some of those classes on the outside, don't try
and look at the core httpapplication/runtime stuff.

The sorts of stuff you need to work at are around the ScriptManager, this
is one of the major buggy pieces from what I recall.

Just don't think it's a week's work and then you're done, it's a massive
undertaking.  You've got a better chance if you aim to just do the bits
your app needs.

I'm happy to help where I can, but my time is very limited at the moment.

On 17 October 2016 at 20:14, Miguel de Icaza via Mono-list <
mono-list@lists.dot.net> wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
>
> It would be nice to use the System.Web implementation from Microsoft, but
> it will require work to isolate the Windows dependencies from the rest of
> the code.
>
>
>
> The Xamarin team at Microsoft is focused on mobile, and we are not likely
> going to work on this area of the code, but we could assist contributors
> that would like to contribute to the replacement of key parts of System.Web
> with the Microsoft implementation.
>
>
>
> Miguel.
>
>
>
> *From: *Mono-list <mono-list-boun...@lists.dot.net> on behalf of Luciano
> _ <ln...@hotmail.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, September 29, 2016 at 2:34 PM
> *To: *"mono-list@lists.dot.net" <mono-list@lists.dot.net>
> *Subject: *[Mono-list] Asp.Net - .Net Source code Integration
>
>
>
>
>
> I was reading .Net Source Code integration doc (*). Is there any plan to
> use Microsoft System.Web and System.Web.Extension in mono? Is there any
> roadmap to know when it will be released?
>
> I'm trying to run asp.net site with a lot of Asp.Net Ajax and it doesn't
> work. It complain a lot of JS errors and it's working in Microsoft asp.net
> implementation, so, i guess it will be fixed with this implementation.
>
>
>
> If  nobody is working on this, which is the work that it should be do it?
>
>
>
> Thanks.
> Lucian0c
>
>
> (*) http://www.mono-project.com/docs/about-mono/dotnet-integration/
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mono-project.com%2Fdocs%2Fabout-mono%2Fdotnet-integration%2F&data=01%7C01%7Cmiguel%40microsoft.com%7Cc2d7961516a74efe2e9108d3e8974386%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1&sdata=8J%2FYT%2BpegzyPi29X2uLFbO00cento2iSnHbMvd95jMw%3D&reserved=0>
>
> .NET Source Code Integration | Mono
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mono-project.com%2Fdocs%2Fabout-mono%2Fdotnet-integration%2F&data=01%7C01%7Cmiguel%40microsoft.com%7Cc2d7961516a74efe2e9108d3e8974386%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1&sdata=8J%2FYT%2BpegzyPi29X2uLFbO00cento2iSnHbMvd95jMw%3D&reserved=0>
>
> www.mono-project.com
>
> With the recent open sourcing of parts of .NET, we want to bring the best
> pieces of .NET to Mono, and contribute the cross platform components of
> Mono to the .NET ...
>
>
>
>
>
> Enviado desde Outlook
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fweboutlook&data=01%7C01%7Cmiguel%40microsoft.com%7Cc2d7961516a74efe2e9108d3e8974386%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1&sdata=0OI48QJI7usCn7N%2F0j9XQY%2FbkKaGA%2B7nS5RRZgMFR7Q%3D&reserved=0>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list@lists.dot.net
> http://lists.dot.net/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>
>
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist  -  Mono-list@lists.dot.net
http://lists.dot.net/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Reply via email to