I think it's important to note that this is not a small job. It will take a lot of investment. There's definitely a few of us who tried, and that's where a lot of the MVC5 code came from.
I for one would love this to happen, it would make my life a lot better (who loves web hosting on windows?). The best bet is to choose some of those classes on the outside, don't try and look at the core httpapplication/runtime stuff. The sorts of stuff you need to work at are around the ScriptManager, this is one of the major buggy pieces from what I recall. Just don't think it's a week's work and then you're done, it's a massive undertaking. You've got a better chance if you aim to just do the bits your app needs. I'm happy to help where I can, but my time is very limited at the moment. On 17 October 2016 at 20:14, Miguel de Icaza via Mono-list < mono-list@lists.dot.net> wrote: > Hello, > > > > It would be nice to use the System.Web implementation from Microsoft, but > it will require work to isolate the Windows dependencies from the rest of > the code. > > > > The Xamarin team at Microsoft is focused on mobile, and we are not likely > going to work on this area of the code, but we could assist contributors > that would like to contribute to the replacement of key parts of System.Web > with the Microsoft implementation. > > > > Miguel. > > > > *From: *Mono-list <mono-list-boun...@lists.dot.net> on behalf of Luciano > _ <ln...@hotmail.com> > *Date: *Thursday, September 29, 2016 at 2:34 PM > *To: *"mono-list@lists.dot.net" <mono-list@lists.dot.net> > *Subject: *[Mono-list] Asp.Net - .Net Source code Integration > > > > > > I was reading .Net Source Code integration doc (*). Is there any plan to > use Microsoft System.Web and System.Web.Extension in mono? Is there any > roadmap to know when it will be released? > > I'm trying to run asp.net site with a lot of Asp.Net Ajax and it doesn't > work. It complain a lot of JS errors and it's working in Microsoft asp.net > implementation, so, i guess it will be fixed with this implementation. > > > > If nobody is working on this, which is the work that it should be do it? > > > > Thanks. > Lucian0c > > > (*) http://www.mono-project.com/docs/about-mono/dotnet-integration/ > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mono-project.com%2Fdocs%2Fabout-mono%2Fdotnet-integration%2F&data=01%7C01%7Cmiguel%40microsoft.com%7Cc2d7961516a74efe2e9108d3e8974386%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1&sdata=8J%2FYT%2BpegzyPi29X2uLFbO00cento2iSnHbMvd95jMw%3D&reserved=0> > > .NET Source Code Integration | Mono > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mono-project.com%2Fdocs%2Fabout-mono%2Fdotnet-integration%2F&data=01%7C01%7Cmiguel%40microsoft.com%7Cc2d7961516a74efe2e9108d3e8974386%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1&sdata=8J%2FYT%2BpegzyPi29X2uLFbO00cento2iSnHbMvd95jMw%3D&reserved=0> > > www.mono-project.com > > With the recent open sourcing of parts of .NET, we want to bring the best > pieces of .NET to Mono, and contribute the cross platform components of > Mono to the .NET ... > > > > > > Enviado desde Outlook > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fweboutlook&data=01%7C01%7Cmiguel%40microsoft.com%7Cc2d7961516a74efe2e9108d3e8974386%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1&sdata=0OI48QJI7usCn7N%2F0j9XQY%2FbkKaGA%2B7nS5RRZgMFR7Q%3D&reserved=0> > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.dot.net > http://lists.dot.net/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > >
_______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.dot.net http://lists.dot.net/mailman/listinfo/mono-list