oh hah, I missed that line in the diff. Nevermind :)
Chris
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 14:47 -0500, Carlos Alberto Cortez wrote:
> I removed the printer_settings field, since it wasn't necessary. Maybe
> we could just change current_settings to printer_settings, like a
> cosmetic change.
>
> Carlos.
I removed the printer_settings field, since it wasn't necessary. Maybe
we could just change current_settings to printer_settings, like a
cosmetic change.
Carlos.
El vie, 28-07-2006 a las 16:24 -0400, Chris Toshok escribió:
> These look fine, particularly if the unit tests pass. Is there any way
In mcs/class/PresentationFramework we a have a months-old start of a
Xaml parser, but nothing on the underlying windowing/compositing
engine was really done.
Seems there isn't a consensus if WPF should be the way (or one of
them) to go in Mono.
:)
On 7/27/06, Jonas Beckeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
These look fine, particularly if the unit tests pass. Is there any way
we can either 1) clear up the names ("current_settings" and
"printer_settings" are confusing), or 2) get rid of one of them and only
have one PrinterSettings object?
Chris
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 14:53 -0500, Carlos Alberto Cor
Hey,
The attached patch fixes the behaviour in
PrintDialog.PrinterSettings/Document, to be consistent with .Net.
I also included some simple nunit tests that ran fine with .Net too.
Carlos.
Index: PrintDialog.cs
==
