On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 08:15:51AM +0300, Dan Aloni wrote:
Might this have something to do with the fact that the server is still
running 0.18?
That shouldn't make any difference, in theory.
-- Nathaniel
--
So let us espouse a less contested notion of truth and falsehood, even
if it is
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 08:15:51AM +0300, Dan Aloni wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 01:04:35PM +0800, Matt Johnston wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 11:41:46PM +0200, Thomas Reitmayr wrote:
FYI, this happened while pulling the database from colinux. As it's my
first time trying to use
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 06:35:37PM +0200, Christof Petig wrote:
All tests pass with the current candidate
463b4f748c4ab4ee9b3a8f1a37ccab1ea84e63cc.
[...]
If you feel confident about this revision (I did not check _every_ line
of the merge ...) I propose to put it into mainline (so that the
[22-05-2005 6:55, Nathaniel Smith escreveu]
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 08:15:51AM +0300, Dan Aloni wrote:
Might this have something to do with the fact that the server is still
running 0.18?
That shouldn't make any difference, in theory.
What about the fact that the stable branch is an old
[22-05-2005 11:31, Nuno Lucas escreveu]
Btw, i don't have any troubles updating to the org.colinux.stable and
org.colinux.devel branches.
Just to add that I also fail to pull a fresh database from
monotone.colinux.org with 0.19. I can pull the org.colinux.stable and
org.colinux.devel branches,
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 02:15:41PM +0800, Matt Johnston wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 08:15:51AM +0300, Dan Aloni wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 01:04:35PM +0800, Matt Johnston wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 11:41:46PM +0200, Thomas Reitmayr wrote:
FYI, this happened while pulling the
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 12:39:07AM +0200, Graydon Hoare wrote:
On 5/20/05, Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Err, crud. You're right. I hadn't actually looked at graydon's
change yet, thanks for pointing it out... This change is a problem,
because it means that we _have_ to support
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 23 May 2005 00:39:07 +0200, Graydon
Hoare [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
graydon.hoare On 5/20/05, Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
graydon.hoare
graydon.hoare Imagine my surprise when the different branches
graydon.hoare weren't connected! And I was
