Re: [Monotone-devel] [Fwd: monotone_0.22-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED]

2005-08-10 Thread Tomas Fasth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker skrev: I got to ask, which revision is it based on? You see, based on the graph of your changes (those that you had trouble with, you can easily see them with monotone-viz), I'm dubious you actually packaged 0.22,

Re: [Monotone-devel] [ANNOUNCE] monotone 0.22

2005-08-10 Thread Daniel THOMPSON
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 14:05 +1200, Matthew Gregan wrote: We shouldn't be able to end up in a situation where the .mt-attrs file has records in it for files that don't exist in that revision... perhaps there is not enough sanity checking being done on the .mt-attrs file. If anyone attempts to

Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone_0.22-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-08-10 Thread Richard Levitte
Tomas Fasth writes: Oh, I see. I'm very sorry, I'm still quite uneasy with how to turn the knobs in the right way on monotone for my needs. Without using monotone-viz, only the CLI, how can I ensure my working copy is following the releases? Somehow I lost track of the head, and I don't

Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone_0.22-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-08-10 Thread Richard Levitte
Tomas Fasth writes: An afterthought; After pull and update, before applying my changes to debian/changelog, the first entry was 0.22-0.1 by Nathaniel. So that would rule out that I was trailing the 0.20 branch. Weird. Have you done a pull and update now? I'm puzzled. Me too. It almost

Re: [Monotone-devel] Performance accounting and testing patch

2005-08-10 Thread Eric Anderson
Nathaniel pointed out in a separate message a point I don't want to get lost in the discussion of this patch. The accounting stuff is OS specific, it would probably compile but not work on a non-linux Unix platform, and may not compile on Windows. There is probably equivalent functionality on

Re: [Monotone-devel] Interesting bug in monotone-viz

2005-08-10 Thread Olivier Andrieu
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [Wednesday 10 August 2005] : If you check out the current monotone repository with monotone-viz, you will see that it looks like it has two heads, or at least split in some way that monotone-viz can't detect properly. I believe the main reason is that

Re: [Monotone-devel] Hosting multiple Monotone projects

2005-08-10 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 01:43:02AM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote: I recently studied Monotone, and I wonder if this is a VCS people would like to host at platforms such as GNU Savannah (http://savannah.gnu.org), and how. I would like to briefly discuss the how first: as far as I could see,

Re: [Monotone-devel] Interesting bug in monotone-viz

2005-08-10 Thread Olivier Andrieu
Richard Levitte [Wednesday 10 August 2005] : Olivier Andrieu writes: I can't quite see what the bug is. The current repository looks fine for me. What graph exactly are you viewing ? the main branch or the .c-s-o one ? with the 'include sub-branches' checkbox ticked or not ?

Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone_0.22-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-08-10 Thread Tomas Fasth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Richard Levitte skrev: Tomas Fasth writes: Oh, I see. I'm very sorry, I'm still quite uneasy with how to turn the knobs in the right way on monotone for my needs. Without using monotone-viz, only the CLI, how can I ensure my working copy is

[Monotone-devel] monotone repository inconsistent??

2005-08-10 Thread Timothy Brownawell
Concerning tests/t_merge_binary.at: Revision f550 has a left ancestor db0b and a right ancestor f2ed, with a common ancestor 734c3. (This is neither the lca (64c8) nor the lcad (7f84).) From 734c3 to db0b, and from db0b to f550 there is no change. From 734c3 to f2ed, it is deleted, and from f2ed

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] monotone 0.22

2005-08-10 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 01:20:10PM +0100, Nick Brown wrote: Nathaniel Smith wrote: I'm please to announce that monotone 0.22 is now available at http://venge.net/monotone/. As always, more binary packages will appear mysteriously from the ether over the next day or two. Packaged and

Re: [Monotone-devel] [ANNOUNCE] monotone 0.22

2005-08-10 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 08:34:24AM +0100, Daniel THOMPSON wrote: On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 14:05 +1200, Matthew Gregan wrote: We shouldn't be able to end up in a situation where the .mt-attrs file has records in it for files that don't exist in that revision... perhaps there is not enough

Re: [Monotone-devel] [Fwd: monotone_0.22-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED]

2005-08-10 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:39:28PM +0200, Tomas Fasth wrote: Monotone version 0.22 has been accepted by the Debian installer process and will shortly reach the Debian package archive for unstable (etch). I have updated the debian files in venge.net repository accordingly. Nathaniel, when

Re: [Monotone-devel] Renaming branches and tags

2005-08-10 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 07:47:14PM -0300, Juan Jose Comellas wrote: Is it possible to rename an already created branch? And what about a tag? I want to change the naming I've been using for branches and I haven't seen any easy way to do this besides recreating everything from scratch. There

Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone: fatal: std::logic_error: revision.cc:260: invariant 'I(cs_left == cs_right)' violated

2005-08-10 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 12:20:33AM +0200, Tomas Fasth wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/work/monotone/monotone/debian$ mt merge monotone: starting with revision 1 / 2 monotone: merging with revision 2 / 2 monotone: [source] 8f5da2ff98cf729256cec8d2ccca3a0c8fc7bfa9 monotone: [source]