On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 07:36 -0500, Ethan Blanton wrote:
This is precisely why Yury is correct. Because, on many systems, \r
and \n have _different meanings_, they should be properly and
reversibly preserved even in text files. What Yury is saying, if I
understand it correctly, is that the
Someone on IRC had an issue today where they did
monotone sync servername 'branchname'
and it pulled 0 revisions. They then tried
monotone sync servername branchname
and were successful. The were running monotone on windows; I seem to
recall someone else getting confused like this before
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 14:16 -0800, Emile Snyder wrote:
Someone on IRC had an issue today where they did
monotone sync servername 'branchname'
and it pulled 0 revisions. They then tried
monotone sync servername branchname
and were successful. The were running monotone on windows; I
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 13:59 +, Bruce Stephens wrote:
I can believe that's true of some text files. But for (to take a
random example) C++ source files, it's surely not true, is it?
That's the problem with current approach: it only takes C/C++ sources
into account.
I'd expect to get C++
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 07:50:51AM -0500, Yury Polyanskiy wrote:
Again: solution is trivial. Transform what I ask you to (LF-CRLF and
back) and don't mess with anything special (like CR-CRLF etc).
The other nice thing about this is that it's perfectly
reversible, even for 'binary' files.
On a
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 1 Feb 2006 14:13:18 +1100, Matthew
Hannigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
mlh On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 07:50:51AM -0500, Yury Polyanskiy wrote:
mlh Again: solution is trivial. Transform what I ask you to
mlh (LF-CRLF and back) and don't mess with anything special
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 31 Jan 2006 07:50:51 -0500, Yury
Polyanskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
yura_pol On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 13:59 +, Bruce Stephens wrote:
yura_pol I can believe that's true of some text files. But for (to
yura_pol take a random example) C++ source files, it's
