Right, let's get this over with. 'mtn' seems the least bad for the
basic name. For the bookkeeping dir, _MTN seemed to have the most
consensus (though IIRC Graydon liked _mtn better, so if he wants to
put in a last minute plea, I guess we can talk).
So:
-- bookkeeping dir changes to _MTN as
Nathaniel Smith schrieb:
-- maybe change the configuration dir from ~/.monotone to ~/.mtn.
No-one seemed to much care for this idea, which seemed a little
weird to me (I dunno, would you expect ls to find its
configuration in ~/.list?), but whatever, this isn't really
urgent
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 01:22:24AM -0800, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
-- maybe change the configuration dir from ~/.monotone to ~/.mtn.
No-one seemed to much care for this idea, which seemed a little
weird to me (I dunno, would you expect ls to find its
configuration in ~/.list?),
On 3/28/06, Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- maybe change the configuration dir from ~/.monotone to ~/.mtn.
No-one seemed to much care for this idea, which seemed a little
weird to me (I dunno, would you expect ls to find its
configuration in ~/.list?), but
Hello,
Does cvs import know how to create real branch points on import yet?
Jordan
___
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 09:05 -0600, Jordan Breeding wrote:
Does cvs import know how to create real branch points on import yet?
monotone can currently import cvs branches, but does not connect them to
the parent branch. This is because it's often not easy to correctly
determinate the time of the
On Tuesday, March 28, 2006, at 10:49AM, Markus Schiltknecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 09:05 -0600, Jordan Breeding wrote:
Does cvs import know how to create real branch points on import yet?
monotone can currently import cvs branches, but does not connect them to
the
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
For the bookkeeping dir, _MTN seemed to have the most consensus (though IIRC Graydon liked _mtn better, so if he wants to put in a last minute plea, I guess we can talk).
I'd prefer lowercase as well. I mean, the proper name of the project
is "monotone", not
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 08:28 +0200, Lapo Luchini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't know if using the new mtn command has something to do with
it, but is it normal that today my usual pull from venge.net
downloaded only one revision, but 10817 new certificates?
Not
Timothy Brownawell wrote:
A number of old revisions now have two sets of certs, one by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (the certs you already had) and one by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (the new certs). What happened is that someone
ran a seperate rosterify, probably due to having their own private
branches that
10 matches
Mail list logo
