Shaun Jackman wrote:
Shaun Jackman wrote:
I have packaged monotone-viz for Debian. It should make its way into
the Debian archives shortly. Enjoy!
On 4/12/06, Matthew A. Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is this going to get included in the net.venge.monotone-viz tree?
I hadn't planned o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Binary package is already available on Cygwin mirrors.
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-04/msg00378.html
The FreeBSD port is waiting for some confirmations, but should be
pretty close.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/95656
I'll be aw
On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 21:53 +0200, Lapo Luchini wrote:
> Is there a practical size limit to a versioned file?
>
> A few scenarios come to my mind:
> a. no limit: the file is read, elaborated, and put in database in chunks
> or something like that
> b. one copy: enough memory is needed to contain t
Is there a practical size limit to a versioned file?
A few scenarios come to my mind:
a. no limit: the file is read, elaborated, and put in database in chunks
or something like that
b. one copy: enough memory is needed to contain the whole file, but no
more copies are needed
c. a few copies: 2-3 c
On 4/14/06, Lapo Luchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Justin Patrin wrote:
> > On 4/12/06, Lapo Luchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Wim Oudshoorn wrote:
> >
> Question Is there an efficient way to find this out?
>
> > "mtn cat fi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Justin Patrin wrote:
> On 4/12/06, Lapo Luchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Wim Oudshoorn wrote:
>
Question Is there an efficient way to find this out?
> "mtn cat filename" gives status 1 on error, else the file content.
> But gettin'
On 4/12/06, Lapo Luchini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Wim Oudshoorn wrote:
> > Question
> >
> > Is there an efficient way to find this out?
> "mtn cat filename" gives status 1 on error, else the file content.
> But gettin' the whole conte
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 12:27:49AM +0200, Lapo Luchini wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > That would change the revision IDs again, woudn't it?
> That's for sure: different hash algorithm, different hash value.
> > Or we could recognise both s
