In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 14 Nov 2006 08:01:56 -0600, Matthew A.
Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
matt I think I'll take a look at how the openssh-server package
matt does it, the maintainer has a few years of experience and it
matt seems to work well...
matt
matt Let us know
Thomas Keller wrote:
Please have a look at the attached patch. I have to excuse that there
are some unrelated changes in this patch (basically renaming of an
automate test to better fit the automate command and some formatting
fixes in monotone.texi) - this won't happen again.
If everything
Graydon Hoare schrieb:
If everything looks alright, I'd happily merge this into nvm soon.
This looks good to me, so long as it passes make check.
Thanks for the work!
It passes!
Now if only http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?18282 gets fixed and the
whole thing will be actually usable with
Question:
If I have a revision A and commit version B:
A - B
and then decide I don't like B anymore, I might create a fork revision C:
A - B
\
C
at which stage I have two heads, so I would have to (in the current
UI) merge them and undo A - B, committing D and E (hope my ASCII art
is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian May wrote:
I can think of two evil reasons:
* somebody committed data without permission and copyright owner is
jumping up and down threatening legal action if it isn't removed
immediately.
AFAIK, this is the case they're concerned with.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Keller wrote:
c) at least bail out with some nicer error message (and not with almost
certainly a bug in monotone), like The file xyz couldn't be checked
out on your system because it contains characters in its name which are
invalid on
