On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 01:10:30PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
Timothy == Timothy Brownawell Timothy writes:
Timothy You don't identify the key by a human-readable
Timothy name. Instead, you identify it by its hash, and there's a
Timothy users/ section in the policy tree that maps
Hi all!
I just wrote a little python script which shows me the translation
status for monotone. For this purpose it queries the files directly via
mtn cat and feeds them into msgfmt -cv.
I initially thought this would be a nice addition for tracmtn (or some
trac module which is included), but
I was wondering: any real reason db migrate doesn't do mtn db
regenerate_caches automatically?
Is there an use case where someone may want to migrate but not to
regenerate caches?
Lapo
___
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
On Tuesday 23 January 2007 11:12, Lapo Luchini wrote:
I was wondering: any real reason db migrate doesn't do mtn db
regenerate_caches automatically?
Is there an use case where someone may want to migrate but not to
regenerate caches?
Maybe the other way round: On the ml there were some
Having seen a few of those segfault problems floating around recently:
might it be worth adding something like the following to configure?
BOOSTGCC=$(strings libboost_date_time-gcc-1_33_1.a |grep '^GCC.*GNU'
|head -n 1 |cut -d ' ' -f 3)
CURRENTGCC=$(gcc --version |head -n 1 |cut -d ' ' -f 3)
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 02:29:48PM +0100, Jon Bright wrote:
Having seen a few of those segfault problems floating around recently:
might it be worth adding something like the following to configure?
BOOSTGCC=$(strings libboost_date_time-gcc-1_33_1.a |grep '^GCC.*GNU'
|head -n 1 |cut -d ' '
Rather than get_revision_cert_trust and accept_testresult_change, how
about two hooks corresponding to the desired operation, accept_head
and accept_update, say.
Where accept_head gets a revision id, branch name, and all of the
certs for the revision, and says whether that revision ought to be
Nathaniel J. Smith wrote:
A (perhaps?) more reliable approach (though it won't work
cross-compiling): just compile a test boost program with $(CXX), make
sure it doesn't blow up...
That would also work - but I was under the impression that compiling
with different GCCs lead to a
Nathaniel J. Smith wrote:
So, I've been thinking -- always dangerous -- about merging again
Ah!
I've done that dangerous thing too, and finally managed to read it all,
step by step, and finally been able if not to the extent of grokking, at
least to have a base understanding of that star-stuff
Zack Weinberg wrote:
It occurred to me that we store a lot of SHA1 hashes in our databases
and they're all twice as big as they need to be because they're in
hex.
Oh, I wanted to say it since day 0.
Or, well, since I discovered that Sqlite3 has no problems with binary zeros.
Or maybe I even
Nathaniel J. Smith wrote:
It would also require some way to actually define # for text files --
this algorithm has only been written down for scalars ATM :-).
Anyway, the answer to your question is that I'm not proposing anything
at all change in monotone -- that's why I said at the
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 02:57:14AM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
Nathaniel J. Smith wrote:
So, I've been thinking -- always dangerous -- about merging again
Ah!
I've done that dangerous thing too, and finally managed to read it all,
step by step, and finally been able if not to the extent
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 09:44:33PM -0800, Nathaniel J. Smith wrote:
mark stuff is sort of the preferred term, though I admit that I
always catch myself calling it star-merge in my own head. The problem
is that star merge means something _completely_ different (and a bit
batty) in old arch
13 matches
Mail list logo
