[Monotone-devel] 'mtn add' output on stderr

2007-01-25 Thread Tim Kettler
Hi, is it by intention that the output of 'mtn add ...' goes to stderr instead of stdout? If so, what is the reason for that. Or should I file a bug? This is with 0.32. -Tim ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org

Re: [Monotone-devel] 'mtn add' output on stderr

2007-01-25 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:45:53 +0100, Tim Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: tim.kettler is it by intention that the output of 'mtn add ...' goes tim.kettler to stderr instead of stdout? If so, what is the reason tim.kettler for that. You mean the status messages such as

[Monotone-devel] Monotone update lost deletions

2007-01-25 Thread J Decker
I cleaned up this branch quite some time ago. After upgrading the database, it's complaining that files that were removed are missing. What further information can I give? ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org

[Monotone-devel] Unnamed directory in a changeset

2007-01-25 Thread Julio M. Merino Vidal
Hi, For some reason, monotone is adding an unnamed directory to my changeset. I have hit this several times already (with 0.31 and 0.32, IIRC, but possibly earlier versions too). This goes as such: mkdir foo mkdir foo/doc touch foo/doc/a mtn --db=foo.mtn db init mtn --db=foo.mtn

Re: [Monotone-devel] Unnamed directory in a changeset

2007-01-25 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:49:53 +0100, Julio M. Merino Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: jmmv84 For some reason, monotone is adding an unnamed directory to my jmmv84 changeset. I have hit this several times already (with 0.31 jmmv84 and 0.32, IIRC, but possibly earlier

Re: [Monotone-devel] Unnamed directory in a changeset

2007-01-25 Thread Chad Walstrom
Julio M. Merino Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Notice the 'add_dir ' line in the reported changeset. This seems to be harmless, but is incorrect. This is the root directory of the first revision. It's there on purpose. Someone can chime in with more specific details. -- Chad Walstrom

[Monotone-devel] Making vocab-from-string constructors explicit?

2007-01-25 Thread Timothy Brownawell
The purpose of our vocab system is to provide some amount of type safety. This is somewhat defeated by having the vocab-from-string constructors not be explicit, there are a number of places that simply use () to allow use of a variable with a type that doesn't match. I'd like to make the