Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: partial pull #3 - calling conventions

2007-05-27 Thread Matt Johnston
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 10:22:54PM +0200, Christian Ohler wrote: Lapo Luchini, 2007-05-26: Space is not the scarce resource here (well, not the most important one, at least, IMHO): time is. Pull time is not only a question of size, it's also (mainly?) a question of the time taken by the

Re: [Monotone-devel] cvs and monotone

2007-05-27 Thread Markus Schiltknecht
Hi, Kelly F. Hickel wrote: Is reality really as dark as it seems at the moment If you really need connected branches, I fear the answer is yes. I'm still struggling with the cvsimport-branch-reconstruction branch of monotone. But CVS is so wicked and brain damaged that it's very hard to

Re: [Monotone-devel] partial pull #2 - gaps instead of a single horizon

2007-05-27 Thread Markus Schiltknecht
Hi, Timothy Brownawell wrote: I was thinking that it would be a completely ordinary revision, with the appropriate revision_id for its text, except that it would be accompanied by a statement from the server (maybe just a new type of special cert?) of This is history-collapsed revision, which

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: linus talk on git

2007-05-27 Thread Brian May
Bruce == Bruce Stephens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bruce I'm not particularly bothered about keeping redundant work Bruce (which in git could vanish); I am worried about ending up Bruce with zillions of branches which have names we no longer Bruce like and which were only of