Re: [Monotone-devel] ANNOUNCE: monotone 0.20

2005-07-07 Thread Florian Weimer
* Nathaniel Smith: When is venge.net switching to 0.20? Just switched it over. With monotone at manifest d538000d4a53ebe2c9b275cb30639aeba22f9e80, I get the following error message when I try to run monotone pull: monotone: warning: caught bad_decode exception decoding input from peer

Re: [Monotone-devel] ANNOUNCE: monotone 0.20

2005-07-07 Thread Postmaster
Florian Weimer schrieb: With monotone at manifest d538000d4a53ebe2c9b275cb30639aeba22f9e80, I get the following error message when I try to run monotone pull: monotone: warning: caught bad_decode exception decoding input from peer venge.net: 'bad checksum 0xde836079 vs. 0x122b5343' Try to

Re: [Monotone-devel] ANNOUNCE: monotone 0.20

2005-07-07 Thread Florian Weimer
Florian Weimer schrieb: With monotone at manifest d538000d4a53ebe2c9b275cb30639aeba22f9e80, I get the following error message when I try to run monotone pull: monotone: warning: caught bad_decode exception decoding input from peer venge.net: 'bad checksum 0xde836079 vs. 0x122b5343' Try to

Re: [Monotone-devel] ANNOUNCE: monotone 0.20 (fwd)

2005-07-07 Thread Vaclav Haisman
] To: Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] ANNOUNCE: monotone 0.20 I had to use the attached patch on FreeBSD to compile monotone. Without it /usr/local/include gets used before $(srcdir)/sqlite and wrong headers are included. VH*** Makefile.am~Wed Jul 6 09:08:25

Re: [Monotone-devel] ANNOUNCE: monotone 0.20

2005-07-07 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 06:25:16PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: Florian Weimer schrieb: With monotone at manifest d538000d4a53ebe2c9b275cb30639aeba22f9e80, I get the following error message when I try to run monotone pull: monotone: warning: caught bad_decode exception decoding input

[Monotone-devel] ANNOUNCE: monotone 0.20

2005-07-06 Thread Nathaniel Smith
I'm happy to announce that monotone 0.20 is now released, and available as usual from the monotone homepage: http://venge.net/monotone/ Source and some binaries are available now; more binaries will be posted as I receive them. The most visible change in this release is that netsync's branch

Re: [Monotone-devel] ANNOUNCE: monotone 0.20

2005-07-06 Thread Stanislav Karchebny
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 13:25, Nathaniel Smith wrote: Source and some binaries are available now; more binaries will be posted as I receive them. ArchLinux package updated. -- Best regards, Stanislav Karchebny Skype name: berkus Get skype for free from www.skype.com

Re: [Monotone-devel] ANNOUNCE: monotone 0.20

2005-07-06 Thread Will Robertson
Hi all, I'm afraid I can't get the source d/l from http://www.venge.net/monotone/downloads/monotone-0.20.tar.gz; to compile on neither Gentoo Linux (i686) nor Solaris 8 (Sparc). They both give similar errors. I have GCC 3.3.5 on Gentoo and GCC 3.4 on Solaris, the optimisations I use on Gentoo

Re: [Monotone-devel] ANNOUNCE: monotone 0.20

2005-07-06 Thread Matt Johnston
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 02:50:34PM +0100, Will Robertson wrote: Hi all, I'm afraid I can't get the source d/l from http://www.venge.net/monotone/downloads/monotone-0.20.tar.gz; to compile on neither Gentoo Linux (i686) nor Solaris 8 (Sparc). They both give similar errors. ...

Re: [Monotone-devel] ANNOUNCE: monotone 0.20

2005-07-06 Thread Matthew A. Nicholson
Nathaniel Smith wrote: The most visible change in this release is that netsync's branch handling has been revamped. This fixes a number of bugs, and removes a significant source of confusion; now, rather than specifying collections that must exactly match between the client and server, both

Re: [Monotone-devel] ANNOUNCE: monotone 0.20

2005-07-06 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 06 Jul 2005 19:45:37 +0200, Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: fw * Richard Levitte: fw fw I wonder why the release number is 0.1 instead of 1. Is there a fw reason, or is this a typo, or something I haven't understood about fw Debian release

Re: [Monotone-devel] ANNOUNCE: monotone 0.20

2005-07-06 Thread Corey Halpin
On 2005-07-06, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: Hmm, the link to the dpkg is incorrect, it should be downloads/monotone_0.20-0.1_i386.deb instead of downloads/monotone_0.20-1_i386.deb . I wonder why the release number is 0.1 instead of 1. Is there a reason, or is this a typo, or

Re: [Monotone-devel] ANNOUNCE: monotone 0.20

2005-07-06 Thread Tomas Fasth
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Richard. Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker skrev: Hmm, the link to the dpkg is incorrect, it should be downloads/monotone_0.20-0.1_i386.deb instead of downloads/monotone_0.20-1_i386.deb . I wonder why the release number is 0.1 instead of 1. Is

Re: [Monotone-devel] ANNOUNCE: monotone 0.20

2005-07-06 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 07:39:56PM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: Hmm, the link to the dpkg is incorrect, it should be downloads/monotone_0.20-0.1_i386.deb instead of downloads/monotone_0.20-1_i386.deb . Thanks. Fixed. -- Nathaniel -- Details are all that matters; God dwells

Re: [Monotone-devel] ANNOUNCE: monotone 0.20

2005-07-06 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:13:00AM -0500, Matthew A. Nicholson wrote: Nathaniel Smith wrote: The most visible change in this release is that netsync's branch handling has been revamped. This fixes a number of bugs, and removes a significant source of confusion; now, rather than specifying