* Nathaniel Smith:
When is venge.net switching to 0.20?
Just switched it over.
With monotone at manifest d538000d4a53ebe2c9b275cb30639aeba22f9e80, I
get the following error message when I try to run monotone pull:
monotone: warning: caught bad_decode exception decoding input from
peer
Florian Weimer schrieb:
With monotone at manifest d538000d4a53ebe2c9b275cb30639aeba22f9e80, I
get the following error message when I try to run monotone pull:
monotone: warning: caught bad_decode exception decoding input from
peer venge.net: 'bad checksum 0xde836079 vs. 0x122b5343'
Try to
Florian Weimer schrieb:
With monotone at manifest d538000d4a53ebe2c9b275cb30639aeba22f9e80, I
get the following error message when I try to run monotone pull:
monotone: warning: caught bad_decode exception decoding input from
peer venge.net: 'bad checksum 0xde836079 vs. 0x122b5343'
Try to
]
To: Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] ANNOUNCE: monotone 0.20
I had to use the attached patch on FreeBSD to compile monotone. Without it
/usr/local/include gets used before $(srcdir)/sqlite and wrong headers are
included.
VH*** Makefile.am~Wed Jul 6 09:08:25
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 06:25:16PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
Florian Weimer schrieb:
With monotone at manifest d538000d4a53ebe2c9b275cb30639aeba22f9e80, I
get the following error message when I try to run monotone pull:
monotone: warning: caught bad_decode exception decoding input
I'm happy to announce that monotone 0.20 is now released, and
available as usual from the monotone homepage:
http://venge.net/monotone/
Source and some binaries are available now; more binaries will be
posted as I receive them.
The most visible change in this release is that netsync's branch
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 13:25, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Source and some binaries are available now; more binaries will be
posted as I receive them.
ArchLinux package updated.
--
Best regards,
Stanislav Karchebny
Skype name: berkus
Get skype for free from www.skype.com
Hi all,
I'm afraid I can't get the source d/l from
http://www.venge.net/monotone/downloads/monotone-0.20.tar.gz; to
compile on neither Gentoo Linux (i686) nor Solaris 8 (Sparc). They both
give similar errors.
I have GCC 3.3.5 on Gentoo and GCC 3.4 on Solaris, the optimisations I
use on Gentoo
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 02:50:34PM +0100, Will Robertson wrote:
Hi all,
I'm afraid I can't get the source d/l from
http://www.venge.net/monotone/downloads/monotone-0.20.tar.gz; to
compile on neither Gentoo Linux (i686) nor Solaris 8 (Sparc). They both
give similar errors.
...
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
The most visible change in this release is that netsync's branch
handling has been revamped. This fixes a number of bugs, and removes
a significant source of confusion; now, rather than specifying
collections that must exactly match between the client and server,
both
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 06 Jul 2005 19:45:37 +0200, Florian
Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
fw * Richard Levitte:
fw
fw I wonder why the release number is 0.1 instead of 1. Is there a
fw reason, or is this a typo, or something I haven't understood about
fw Debian release
On 2005-07-06, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
Hmm, the link to the dpkg is incorrect, it should be
downloads/monotone_0.20-0.1_i386.deb instead of
downloads/monotone_0.20-1_i386.deb .
I wonder why the release number is 0.1 instead of 1. Is there a
reason, or is this a typo, or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Richard.
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker skrev:
Hmm, the link to the dpkg is incorrect, it should be
downloads/monotone_0.20-0.1_i386.deb instead of
downloads/monotone_0.20-1_i386.deb .
I wonder why the release number is 0.1 instead of 1. Is
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 07:39:56PM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
Hmm, the link to the dpkg is incorrect, it should be
downloads/monotone_0.20-0.1_i386.deb instead of
downloads/monotone_0.20-1_i386.deb .
Thanks. Fixed.
-- Nathaniel
--
Details are all that matters; God dwells
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:13:00AM -0500, Matthew A. Nicholson wrote:
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
The most visible change in this release is that netsync's branch
handling has been revamped. This fixes a number of bugs, and removes
a significant source of confusion; now, rather than specifying
15 matches
Mail list logo