In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:15:26 -0700, Larry
Hastings [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
larry You can read more about it, and download a copy, here:
larry http://www.midwinter.com/~lch/programming/m7/
Looks nice, except for one thing: I wish you would have used a
different
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
I wish you would have used a different cert than the tag one, and I certainly hope noone will choose to populate the monotone database. "monotone list tags" will just not be the same experience (I can already see myself screaming "GAH!")...
Well, I
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 27 Sep 2005 05:45:39 -0700, Larry
Hastings [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
larry As far as not using tag certs for the ids, I don't really
larry agree. Ignoring the specific argument cited above, are there
larry any other reasons they /shouldn't/ they be tags?
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
for x in `monotone automate select c:tag='monotree*'`; do monotone list certs $x; done
Ah, so they could be pulled out of monotone without
resorting to SQL today. Thanks! (It would be an O(N) operation, as
compared to an O(1) operation with monotone
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 27 Sep 2005 07:07:59 -0700, Larry
Hastings [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
larry 1. it makes special cases of tags. So far, a tag is a tag is
larrya tag. What you propose is that a tag is a tag... unless
larryit looks this way.
larry
larry
larry I don't
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 27 Sep 2005 09:48:32 -0500, Timothy
Brownawell [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
tbrownaw ...actually, if we had a convenient way to list arbitrary
tbrownaw certs the way we list tags ...
Is this desirable? I've no problems create that command, the
questions is only
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 17:00 +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 27 Sep 2005 09:48:32 -0500, Timothy
Brownawell [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
tbrownaw ...actually, if we had a convenient way to list arbitrary
tbrownaw certs the way we list tags ...
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:43:13 -0500, Timothy
Brownawell [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
tbrownaw On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 17:00 +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
wrote:
tbrownaw Is this desirable? I've no problems create that command,
tbrownaw the questions is only what
On 9/27/05, Larry Hastings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
for x in `monotone automate select c:tag='monotree*'`; do monotone list
certs $x; done
Ah, so they could be pulled out of monotone without resorting to SQL today.
Thanks! (It would be an O(N)
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 10:40:50AM -0700, Larry Hastings wrote:
Sure, but it's the per-monotone-process overhead that I was really
speaking to. I imagine that monotone gets going, it's mighty quick at
culling certs from the database. If I could do it all in one invocation
of
(Well, okay, not gen-u-ine revision numbers, but an incredible
simulation.)
m7 is a Python script that works as a drop-in replacement for
running monotone directly. It's known to run on Windows,
Linux, and Mac OS X. It requires Python 2.3.5 and monotone
0.22. It is open-source, released
11 matches
Mail list logo
