On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:24:36AM +0200, Lapo Luchini wrote:
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
In python, all the local variables come from
the function arguments.
So, readability is preferred over an implicit shorter-to-write form...
thinking about it, doesn't seems like a bad idea. Only a bit
Hi,
I'm missing the beginning of the thread. What benchmark harness are we
talking about?
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
requirements are part of the benchmark harness, nothing to do with
python -- before the harness runs some benchmark, it looks at the
benchmark object to see if it has any
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:57:07AM +0200, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
Hi,
I'm missing the beginning of the thread. What benchmark harness are we
talking about?
The one in net.venge.monotone.contrib.benchmark. The thread is at:
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
The one in net.venge.monotone.contrib.benchmark. The thread is at:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.monotone.devel/7524/focus=7527
Thank you.
Strange that I don't have those messages in my mailbox.
gmane.comp.version-control.monotone.devel mirrors
Hi,
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
The one in net.venge.monotone.contrib.benchmark. The thread is at:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.monotone.devel/7524/focus=7527
I'm currently playing around with that branch. Two things, a minor one:
$ ./drop_caches
Trying
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
As an example, let's look at the InitialPull benchmark.
I know no Python, I have no idea what a requirement is, I wonder why
this as to be declared as a first parameter (linke in a language born
when OOP meanth nothing
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:52:26PM +0200, Lapo Luchini wrote:
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
As an example, let's look at the InitialPull benchmark.
I know no Python, I have no idea what a requirement is, I wonder why
requirements are part of the benchmark harness, nothing to do with
python --
