Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Why is utf8 type _NOVERIFY, and other vocab stuff.

2007-02-17 Thread Zack Weinberg
On 2/16/07, Justin Patrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Running these commands over PuTTY on my Gentoo system (from Windows) gives me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ echo \xC2\xB7 | iconv -f UTF-8 -t CP1252//IGNORE//TRANSLIT \xC2\xB7 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ echo \xC2\xB7 | iconv -f UTF-8 -t

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Why is utf8 type _NOVERIFY, and other vocab stuff.

2007-02-17 Thread Justin Patrin
On 2/17/07, Zack Weinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/16/07, Justin Patrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Running these commands over PuTTY on my Gentoo system (from Windows) gives me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ echo \xC2\xB7 | iconv -f UTF-8 -t CP1252//IGNORE//TRANSLIT \xC2\xB7 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Why is utf8 type _NOVERIFY, and other vocab stuff.

2007-02-16 Thread Justin Patrin
On 2/15/07, Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Zack Weinberg wrote: The //IGNORE and //TRANSLIT features are glibc / GNU libiconv specific, but I would have thought that they were available in recent Gentoo (they've been around since 2001 give or take). I thought they would be present on

[Monotone-devel] Re: Why is utf8 type _NOVERIFY, and other vocab stuff.

2007-02-15 Thread Lapo Luchini
Nathaniel Smith wrote: (Also, there were reports that the _best_effort code didn't actually work with lots of broken iconv's found in the wild...) On Derek's super-laptop UTF8 to ASCII//IGNORE//TRANSLIT actually failed just like it was plain UTF8 to ASCII. AFAIR it was a Gentoo. I'm willing

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Why is utf8 type _NOVERIFY, and other vocab stuff.

2007-02-15 Thread Zack Weinberg
On 2/15/07, Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nathaniel Smith wrote: (Also, there were reports that the _best_effort code didn't actually work with lots of broken iconv's found in the wild...) On Derek's super-laptop UTF8 to ASCII//IGNORE//TRANSLIT actually failed just like it was plain

[Monotone-devel] Re: Why is utf8 type _NOVERIFY, and other vocab stuff.

2007-02-15 Thread Lapo Luchini
Zack Weinberg wrote: The //IGNORE and //TRANSLIT features are glibc / GNU libiconv specific, but I would have thought that they were available in recent Gentoo (they've been around since 2001 give or take). I thought they would be present on *most* BSD and Linux available today... Uh. I know

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Why is utf8 type _NOVERIFY, and other vocab stuff.

2007-02-15 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 02:54:45PM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote: Nathaniel Smith wrote: (Also, there were reports that the _best_effort code didn't actually work with lots of broken iconv's found in the wild...) On Derek's super-laptop UTF8 to ASCII//IGNORE//TRANSLIT actually failed just