Hallo,
On 12/20/06, Matthew A. Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex Queiroz wrote:
Hallo,
On 12/19/06, Patrick Mauritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zack Weinberg schrieb:
actually do us some good (in particular, it will let us properly
resolve the Debian crasher bug that was reported
Hallo,
On 12/20/06, Patrick Mauritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex Queiroz wrote:
But most users will use the libboost-regex bundled by the
distributor, such as Debian in my case.
then report a bug against boost at your distributor, for providing a
non-thread boost with threading
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 08:27:42AM -0300, Alex Queiroz wrote:
I guess Zack wrote that the ICU developers don't intend to change it?
I didn't mean the ICU people to change it. just having the debian _boost_
package conform to its protocol (ie. the non-mt libraries not using mt stuff),
that
On 12/20/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 08:27:42AM -0300, Alex Queiroz wrote:
I guess Zack wrote that the ICU developers don't intend to change it?
I didn't mean the ICU people to change it. just having the debian _boost_
package conform to its
On 12/18/06, Zack Weinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On nvm.experiment.pcre is a version of monotone that uses Philip
Hazel's PCRE (Perl Compatible Regular Expressions) library instead of
boost::regex.
I forgot to mention what I think is the #1 reason we should do this,
and the biggest
Zack Weinberg schrieb:
actually do us some good (in particular, it will let us properly
resolve the Debian crasher bug that was reported just before 0.31).
Uh, boost is built without ICU here - maybe _that_ is the proper fix?
patrick mauritz
___
Zack Weinberg wrote:
we know distributors want us to move toward using
unbundled libraries, and PCRE is nice and stable, so this should not
pose us any problems.
with FreeBSD devel/monotone port maintainer hat
Hey dude, what about that external LUA could be usable after all
because we can
Hallo,
On 12/19/06, Patrick Mauritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zack Weinberg schrieb:
actually do us some good (in particular, it will let us properly
resolve the Debian crasher bug that was reported just before 0.31).
Uh, boost is built without ICU here - maybe _that_ is the proper fix?
Alex Queiroz wrote:
Hallo,
On 12/19/06, Patrick Mauritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zack Weinberg schrieb:
actually do us some good (in particular, it will let us properly
resolve the Debian crasher bug that was reported just before 0.31).
Uh, boost is built without ICU here - maybe _that_ is
On 12/19/06, Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey dude, what about that external LUA could be usable after all
because we can overwrite system.os() with a null value anyway stuff?
That's nice and all, but is not what I want to do right now. One
thing at a time.
zw
10 matches
Mail list logo
