Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Umm, Derek? 'automate' is where we're supposed to actually care about
compatibility -- that we happened to tweak the changeset format is
fine, but I'm sure the connection between that and the inventory
output format is not obvious to people implementing 3rd-party tools,
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
compatibility -- that we happened to tweak the changeset format is
fine, but I'm sure the connection between that and the inventory
output format is not obvious to people implementing 3rd-party tools,
and this is something that would be have pretty trivial to keep the
Daniel THOMPSON wrote:
Hi Folks
Recently upgraded to and started using in earnest a post-rosters version
of monotone (0.28). Everything is going pretty well but it appears that
the behavior of 'automate inventory' has changed since the last version
I used (0.25) and this has causes knock on
Hi Folks
Recently upgraded to and started using in earnest a post-rosters version
of monotone (0.28). Everything is going pretty well but it appears that
the behavior of 'automate inventory' has changed since the last version
I used (0.25) and this has causes knock on problems with clients of
