[Monotone-devel] bug in monotone

2009-07-26 Thread Petr Vorel
Hi there, I got an error report while I was trying to do: mtn log mtn log --last 5 in my repo dir. Is that enough information for you? Thanks for your hard work trying to make monotone perfect :-). Petr --- jabber: pe...@jabber.cz PGP: http://sipe.cz/pe...@seznam.

Re: [Monotone-devel] bug in monotone

2009-05-09 Thread Derek Scherger
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Timothy Brownawell wrote: > > 'update' is now noisy when modifying a file with mtn:execute set, but at > least it doesn't lose the execute bits. > That's intentional, I was hoping it would be helpful and not too annoying. The code that fiddles with the execute bits

Re: [Monotone-devel] bug in monotone

2009-05-09 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 11:43 -0600, Derek Scherger wrote: > > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Thomas Keller > wrote: > Timothy Brownawell schrieb: > > On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 17:23 -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote: > >> Do you think this bug is significant enough to warrant an >

Re: [Monotone-devel] bug in monotone

2009-05-09 Thread Derek Scherger
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Thomas Keller wrote: > Timothy Brownawell schrieb: > > On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 17:23 -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote: > >> Do you think this bug is significant enough to warrant an 0.43.1 patch > release? > > > > Probably yes, since our releases seem to be getting so much

Re: [Monotone-devel] bug in monotone

2009-05-08 Thread Thomas Keller
Timothy Brownawell schrieb: > On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 17:23 -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote: >> Do you think this bug is significant enough to warrant an 0.43.1 patch >> release? > > Probably yes, since our releases seem to be getting so much farther > apart lately. It would also be good to include ea4d

Re: [Monotone-devel] bug in monotone

2009-05-07 Thread Derek Scherger
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote: > On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Timothy Brownawell > wrote: > ... > > Or we could just release 0.44, it has been over a month. > > I'd be fine with that. Richard, what do you think? Sounds good to me. I've just committed a new test in 8c

Re: [Monotone-devel] bug in monotone

2009-05-07 Thread Zack Weinberg
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Timothy Brownawell wrote: ... > Or we could just release 0.44, it has been over a month. I'd be fine with that. Richard, what do you think? zw ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.non

Re: [Monotone-devel] bug in monotone

2009-05-07 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 17:23 -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote: > Do you think this bug is significant enough to warrant an 0.43.1 patch > release? Probably yes, since our releases seem to be getting so much farther apart lately. It would also be good to include ea4d30c70b..., since that bug can make som

Re: [Monotone-devel] bug in monotone

2009-05-07 Thread Zack Weinberg
Do you think this bug is significant enough to warrant an 0.43.1 patch release? zw On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Timothy Brownawell wrote: > On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 13:50 +0200, Petr Vorel wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I had problems with monotone 0.43 (base revision: >> ddc6546051abf6475c40a3fdba272e

Re: [Monotone-devel] bug in monotone

2009-05-07 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 13:50 +0200, Petr Vorel wrote: > Hello, > > I had problems with monotone 0.43 (base revision: > ddc6546051abf6475c40a3fdba272e2f82a40e94). > More info you can find in attached files. > > This occured when I tried to commit something. I solved it with downgrade to > version

[Monotone-devel] bug in monotone

2009-05-07 Thread Petr Vorel
Hello, I had problems with monotone 0.43 (base revision: ddc6546051abf6475c40a3fdba272e2f82a40e94). More info you can find in attached files. This occured when I tried to commit something. I solved it with downgrade to version 0.40: Čt kvě 07 13:49 petr@: ~ $ mtn version --full monotone 0.40 (b

Re: [Monotone-devel] bug in monotone / January Mini Summit

2009-01-19 Thread Lapo Luchini
Philipp Gröschler wrote: > Anonymous write access? Uh, nope, you should send your key to Richard in order to be able to push revisions. > If noone objects then I could test the TechinfoML -> Wiki converter this > way. As long as these parts don't get linked from somewhere, nobody > should find th

Re: [Monotone-devel] bug in monotone

2009-01-09 Thread Thomas Keller
Helmut Stiegler schrieb: > Hi Thomas and Markus! > > Thank you for your fast reply! > > But the documentation states (section internationalization): > > /File path names in the workspace are converted to the locale's character > set (determined via the LANG or CHARSET environment variabl

Re: [Monotone-devel] bug in monotone

2009-01-09 Thread Helmut Stiegler
Hi Thomas and Markus! Thank you for your fast reply! But the documentation states (section internationalization): File path names in the workspace are converted to the locale's character set (determined via the LANG or CHARSET environment variables) before monotone interacts with the file sy

Re: [Monotone-devel] bug in monotone

2009-01-08 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Thomas Keller wrote: > We should try, right. Problem is that the invariant exists at two place > (path_component::path_component(string const &d) and > path_component::path_component(char const * d)) where the original error > could either come from the inside (i.e.

Re: [Monotone-devel] bug in monotone

2009-01-08 Thread Derek Scherger
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Thomas Keller wrote: > > And no, I don't think organizing TODOs is of any help as long as nobody > actually feels responsible for any. And the low feedback on the upcoming > Mini Summit so far proves me right. > Thanks Tommy, You've prompted me into responding! I

Re: [Monotone-devel] bug in monotone

2009-01-08 Thread Thomas Keller
Markus Wanner schrieb: > Thomas Keller wrote: >> Anyways, the error is quite common and unfortunately won't be fixed any >> time soon. > > Let's at least say: we should try to improve the error message. We should try, right. Problem is that the invariant exists at two place (path_component::path_

Re: [Monotone-devel] bug in monotone / January Mini Summit

2009-01-08 Thread Philipp Gröschler
Markus Wanner schrieb: > Let's at least say: we should try to improve the error message. Do we > have some sort of TODO file or something? Or is this a summit'09 task: > to organize todo items? With a little help from outside, I think I could at least try to do some work here. That weekend is alre

Re: [Monotone-devel] bug in monotone

2009-01-08 Thread Markus Wanner
Hi, Thomas Keller wrote: > Anyways, the error is quite common and unfortunately won't be fixed any > time soon. Let's at least say: we should try to improve the error message. Do we have some sort of TODO file or something? Or is this a summit'09 task: to organize todo items? Regards Markus Wan

Re: [Monotone-devel] bug in monotone

2009-01-08 Thread Thomas Keller
Hello Helmut! > i got the following error message: > > mtn: Fataler Fehler: std::logic_error: paths.cc:425: Invariante > 'I(utf8_validate > (utf8(data)) && !has_bad_component_chars(data) && data != "." && data != > "..")' > verletzt > mtn: Dies ist ganz bestimmt ein Fehler in m

[Monotone-devel] bug in monotone

2009-01-08 Thread Helmut Stiegler
Hallo, i got the following error message: mtn: Fataler Fehler: std::logic_error: paths.cc:425: Invariante 'I(utf8_validate (utf8(data)) && !has_bad_component_chars(data) && data != "." && data != "..")' verletzt mtn: Dies ist ganz bestimmt ein Fehler in monotone. mtn: Bitte senden Sie diese N

Re: [Monotone-devel] Bug in monotone automate inventory?

2007-01-03 Thread Thomas Keller
Thomas Keller schrieb: > Should be fixed in a few. Fixed in 30e96910134cf28764736f0439e299b5e6fe2b26 (just pushed). If you don't like to rebuild, you can "fix" the problem by disabling the inodeprints cache (remove _MTN/inodeprints and check your lua hooks as explained here: http://venge.net/monot

Re: [Monotone-devel] Bug in monotone automate inventory?

2007-01-03 Thread Thomas Keller
Wim Oudshoorn schrieb: > We just upgraded from monotone version 0.23 to 0.32. > I have a fresh checkout from this database and > when I do: > > mtn list missing > > monotone does not generate any output, as expected. > However when i do > > mtn automate inventory > > it generates lots of outp

[Monotone-devel] Bug in monotone automate inventory?

2007-01-03 Thread Wim Oudshoorn
We just upgraded from monotone version 0.23 to 0.32. I have a fresh checkout from this database and when I do: mtn list missing monotone does not generate any output, as expected. However when i do mtn automate inventory it generates lots of output, starting with: M 0 0 .mtn-ignore 0 0

Re: [Monotone-devel] Bug in monotone automate inventory

2005-10-27 Thread Emile Snyder
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 19:57 +0200, Jon Bright wrote: > Emile Snyder wrote: > > > > No, this is clearly a bug in monotone. You created a legal file on your > > system in the working copy, and monotone choked and died. Thanks for > > digging and figuring it out, > > An interesting question - shou

Re: [Monotone-devel] Bug in monotone automate inventory

2005-10-27 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 07:57:07PM +0200, Jon Bright wrote: > An interesting question - should monotone allow you to create any old > filename, or should it restrict you to names with half a chance of being > cross-platform compatible? I'd argue for at least the default to be the > latter, on t

Re: [Monotone-devel] Bug in monotone automate inventory

2005-10-27 Thread Jon Bright
Emile Snyder wrote: No, this is clearly a bug in monotone. You created a legal file on your system in the working copy, and monotone choked and died. Thanks for digging and figuring it out, An interesting question - should monotone allow you to create any old filename, or should it restrict

Re: [Monotone-devel] Bug in monotone automate inventory

2005-10-27 Thread Emile Snyder
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 15:41 +0100, Ian France wrote: > Hi Nathaniel, > >I took a moment out of java programming to add some logging > statements to the monotone code and discovered the problem. I had > somehow managed to create a file with the name '^G' i.e. 0x07. Monotone > was rejecting t

Re: [Monotone-devel] Bug in monotone automate inventory

2005-10-27 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 15:41 +0100, Ian France wrote: > Hi Nathaniel, > >I took a moment out of java programming to add some logging > statements to the monotone code and discovered the problem. I had > somehow managed to create a file with the name '^G' i.e. 0x07. Monotone > was rejecting t

Re: [Monotone-devel] Bug in monotone automate inventory

2005-10-27 Thread Ian France
Hi Nathaniel, I took a moment out of java programming to add some logging statements to the monotone code and discovered the problem. I had somehow managed to create a file with the name '^G' i.e. 0x07. Monotone was rejecting this (quite reasonably) as an illegal filename. Sorry to have

Re: [Monotone-devel] Bug in monotone automate inventory

2005-10-27 Thread Ian France
Are you, by chance, running 'automate inventory' from inside the MT/ directory of a working copy? There was a bug in 0.23 (fixed in mainline) that would cause many operations to fail if monotone's initial working directory was an MT/ directory. No, I'm afraid not. I have also found that I get

Re: [Monotone-devel] Bug in monotone automate inventory

2005-10-27 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 10:33:12AM +0100, Ian France wrote: > > monotone automate inventory > monotone: fatal: std::logic_error: paths.cc:209: invariant > 'I(is_valid_internal(data()))' violated Are you, by chance, running 'automate inventory' from inside the MT/ directory of a working copy? The

[Monotone-devel] Bug in monotone automate inventory

2005-10-27 Thread Ian France
"monotone automate inventory" crashes. It is the first time that I have run that command since upgrading from version 0.19 to 0.23, I did remember to run the db migrate against the database. I have been checking out, propagating and merging succesfully since the update. Output of the comman

Re: [Monotone-devel] Bug in monotone lca

2005-05-19 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 07:29:14PM +0200, Wim Oudshoorn wrote: > Timothy Brownawell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > But A *is* the least common ancestor (M->K->B->A; N->L->D->A). That > > it's also an ancestor of a more distant common ancestor doesn't > > matter. Distances can be funny that way. >

Re: [Monotone-devel] Bug in monotone lca

2005-05-19 Thread Wim Oudshoorn
Timothy Brownawell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 5/19/05, Wim Oudshoorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> If you have the following revision graph: >> >>A >> /|\ >> B C D >> / / \ \ >>/ E

Re: [Monotone-devel] Bug in monotone lca

2005-05-19 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 5/19/05, Wim Oudshoorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you have the following revision graph: > >A > /|\ > B C D > / / \ \ >/ E F \ > / / \ \ >

[Monotone-devel] Bug in monotone lca

2005-05-19 Thread Wim Oudshoorn
If you have the following revision graph: A /|\ B C D / / \ \ / E F \ / / \ \ / G H \ / | | \ |