On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 12:21:46PM -0700, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Well, umm, blame cmarcelo, I guess :-):
http://del.icio.us/tag/monotone
Ah, right. That's Caio.
As a practical matter, I find it unlikely that the FSF will release a
GPL v3 that somehow cannot be applied to, say... gnupg.
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 12:10:42PM -0700, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Just noticed this project:
http://aleph0.info/apso/
Early stages, but might interest some people here.
Er... That page is terribly outdated. The project has gone through many
changes after I set up the page.
And I'm curious to
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 13:29 -0700, Rob Schoening wrote:
but my question is really: how vulnerable is mtn serve today to DoS
and buffer overrun type exploits?
DoS: It'd be fairly simple to make monotone eat all your CPU (or on an
SMP box, as much CPU as a single-threaded program can eat). If
Wrong reply button...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Nuno Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jul 10, 2006 10:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] encrypted monotone (and digression on
To: Rob Schoening [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7/10/06, Rob Schoening [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have
