Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz writes:
Am 03.02.11 13:43, schrieb Stephen Leake:
Stephen Leake stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org writes:
The non-source files for building the win32 installer are modpath.iss,
monotone.bmp, and monotone.iss.in. There is also related code in
Makefile.am.
In message 4d4b4304.1050...@thomaskeller.biz on Fri, 04 Feb 2011 01:06:28
+0100, Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz said:
me Am 03.02.11 10:09, schrieb Thomas Keller:
me I'll review the latest changes later on, I was a bit
me busy over the last couple of days...
me
me Here we go:
me
me * A
Am 04.02.2011 10:14, schrieb Richard Levitte:
me * make distcheck prints out a spurious warning at the beginning:
me make[1]: Circular htmldir - html dependency dropped.
me Can this be safely ignored or is this something we should look after?
me (Its issued right after makeinfo --html)
In message 4d4bc72f.3030...@thomaskeller.biz on Fri, 04 Feb 2011 10:30:23
+0100, Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz said:
me Am 04.02.2011 10:14, schrieb Richard Levitte:
me me * make distcheck prints out a spurious warning at the beginning:
me me make[1]: Circular htmldir - html
Am 31.01.11 00:08, schrieb Thomas Keller:
So please have a look at the changes in this branch and give us
feedback. If you think it is not a good idea to merge this into nvm yet,
then please also tell us. In case nobody places serious objections I'd
like to merge the branch by the end of next
Am 03.02.2011 07:08, schrieb Stephen Leake:
Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz writes:
There are a couple of minor issues left which kind of block the merge
back to nvm, one of them is the move of some innosetup-specific
resources out of src/win32
I'm not clear what the issue is here.
Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz writes:
Am 03.02.2011 07:08, schrieb Stephen Leake:
Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz writes:
There are a couple of minor issues left which kind of block the merge
back to nvm, one of them is the move of some innosetup-specific
resources out of
Stephen Leake stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org writes:
The non-source files for building the win32 installer are modpath.iss,
monotone.bmp, and monotone.iss.in. There is also related code in
Makefile.am.
...
I'm not strongly opposed to moving those three files to
root/win32_install (do you
In message 82oc6ts42k@stephe-leake.org on Thu, 03 Feb 2011 07:19:47
-0500, Stephen Leake stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org said:
stephen_leake For building the Unix .tar.gz, the equivalent code is in
stephen_leake root/Makefile.am, root/doc/Makefile.am. In larger
stephen_leake projects, there
In message 82hbcls2z6@stephe-leake.org on Thu, 03 Feb 2011 07:43:25
-0500, Stephen Leake stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org said:
stephen_leake Then we could have files in root/packages/... are source for
stephen_leake distribution packages and/or installers (except Makfile.am goes
where
Am 03.02.11 13:43, schrieb Stephen Leake:
Stephen Leake stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org writes:
The non-source files for building the win32 installer are modpath.iss,
monotone.bmp, and monotone.iss.in. There is also related code in
Makefile.am.
...
I'm not strongly opposed to moving those
Am 03.02.11 10:09, schrieb Thomas Keller:
I'll review the latest changes later on, I was a bit
busy over the last couple of days...
Here we go:
* A make clean in the source directory now purges the original files as
it makes no difference if these reside in the source or build
directory.
Am 04.02.11 01:06, schrieb Thomas Keller:
* I removed the removal of doc/*-specific resources in the main
Makefile.am's mostlyclean-local - I think this is probably done more
cleanly in doc/Makefile.am now.
This was probably a mistake, because distcheck reports at the very end
ERROR:
Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz writes:
There are a couple of minor issues left which kind of block the merge
back to nvm, one of them is the move of some innosetup-specific
resources out of src/win32
I'm not clear what the issue is here. In any case, 'make
win32-installer' now works,
Hi all!
Richard, Stephe and me polished the above branch over the last weeks and
got positive response from a couple of people that it works well for
them. For those who weren't following the previous development, this
branch is basically about moving stuff around into specific directories,
i.e.
On 01/30/2011 05:08 PM, Thomas Keller wrote:
Hi all!
Richard, Stephe and me polished the above branch over the last weeks and
got positive response from a couple of people that it works well for
them. For those who weren't following the previous development, this
branch is basically about
16 matches
Mail list logo
