Jack Lloyd wrote:
Montone's revert --missing seems to base paths off the current
directory, rather than the base directory of the workspace. I think
most people seeing this would realize the problem and self-correct,
but it is strange (drop --missing seems to do the right thing and work
no
Derek Scherger wrote:
1. I think that 'revert --missing' currently has different behaviour
than 'drop --missing' and 'add --unknown' and I'm curious as to what
people's expectations are. What 'revert --missing' does when it has a
restriction (i.e. 'revert --missing path ...') is essentially
Montone's revert --missing seems to base paths off the current
directory, rather than the base directory of the workspace. I think
most people seeing this would realize the problem and self-correct,
but it is strange (drop --missing seems to do the right thing and work
no matter what the cwd is).
On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 08:29 -0400, Jack Lloyd wrote:
Montone's revert --missing seems to base paths off the current
directory, rather than the base directory of the workspace.
Yes. This has been fixed, and will work properly in the next release.
Tim
