In message 20110203072618.ga27...@topoi.pooq.com on Thu, 3 Feb 2011 02:26:18
-0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said:
hendrik On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 12:09:23AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote:
hendrik In message 20110201200533.ga8...@topoi.pooq.com on Tue, 1 Feb 2011
15:05:33 -0500,
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:28:06AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote:
In message 20110203072618.ga27...@topoi.pooq.com on Thu, 3 Feb 2011
02:26:18 -0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said:
When it comes to automatic starts, such as starting a monotone server
under usher, this is of course
In message 20110203160429.ga5...@topoi.pooq.com on Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:04:29
-0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said:
hendrik I don't really see a big difference between the script being
hendrik protected and the separate file being protected. Unless the
hendrik file with the scripts
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 12:09:23AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote:
In message 20110201200533.ga8...@topoi.pooq.com on Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:05:33
-0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said:
In your configuration file, you have a logdir setting. You might want
to look at the log file there
In message 20110201200533.ga8...@topoi.pooq.com on Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:05:33
-0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said:
hendrik On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 02:04:46PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
hendrik
hendrik I guess now comes the inevitable flood of stupid questions as i try
to
hendrik
In message 20110131075604.ga14...@topoi.pooq.com on Mon, 31 Jan 2011 02:56:04
-0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said:
hendrik On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 02:22:37AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote:
hendrik In message 20101119201102.ga25...@topoi.pooq.com on Fri, 19 Nov
2010 15:11:02 -0500,
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 02:22:37AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote:
In message 20101119201102.ga25...@topoi.pooq.com on Fri, 19 Nov 2010
15:11:02 -0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said:
hendrik (2) Is there a comment convention for the usher config file?
comment This is a lengthy
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 02:04:46PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
I guess now comes the inevitable flood of stupid questions as i try to
make sense of the documentation.
More stupid question.
(1) The listen addr in the sample script is 0.0.0.0:4691.
The 4691 is the usual monotone port
In message 20101119201102.ga25...@topoi.pooq.com on Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:11:02
-0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said:
hendrik (1) The listen addr in the sample script is 0.0.0.0:4691.
hendrik
hendrikThe 4691 is the usual monotone port number.
hendrik
hendrikBut I'm not
On 11/09/2010 10:31 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 08:50:26PM -0600, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
On 11/08/2010 01:49 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as
On 11/08/2010 01:49 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as
usher-0.99 available from
mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher
and there is a tarball available at
On 11/08/2010 01:04 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as
usher-0.99 available from
mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher
and there is a tarball available at
On 11/08/2010 12:36 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
Well, I did download the tarball,
http://mtn-host.prjek.net/projects/webhost/files/usher-0.99.tar.gz
and untarred it. The README file says
The documentation is in doc/documentation.html.
But there is no doc directory to be found in the
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 08:50:26PM -0600, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
On 11/08/2010 01:49 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as
usher-0.99 available from
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as
usher-0.99 available from
mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher
This is what I've been waiting for! But my browser had other ideas ...
You
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as
usher-0.99 available from
mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher
and there is a tarball available at
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as
usher-0.99 available from
mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher
and there is a tarball available at
Am 08.11.10 19:36, schrieb Hendrik Boom:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as
usher-0.99 available from
mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher
This is what I've been waiting for!
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 06:36:38AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote:
This is a piece of software I'd like to see debianised...
I see there's an ld debian branch...
I wonder whether it should be a replacement for
monotone-server. In function, if not in name.
-- hendrik
There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as
usher-0.99 available from
mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher
and there is a tarball available at
http://mtn-host.prjek.net/projects/webhost/files/usher-0.99.tar.gz
. It works on at least Debian and FreeBSD.
This is a piece of software I'd like to see debianised...
I see there's an ld debian branch...
Cheers,
Richard
In message 4cd4dd8b.4080...@prjek.net on Fri, 05 Nov 2010 23:46:03 -0500,
Timothy Brownawell tbrow...@prjek.net said:
tbrownaw There is an actual release of usher available now.
21 matches
Mail list logo
