[Monotone-devel] popen replacement

2007-02-18 Thread William Uther
Hi all, A while ago I came across the fact that popen was disabled in the Lua hooks in monotone for security reasons. Here is a patch that replaces it with a security conscious version (like spawn() replaces execute()). The 'security consciousness' is simply accepting the command as

Re: [Monotone-devel] popen replacement

2007-02-18 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 20:44 +1100, William Uther wrote: Hi all, A while ago I came across the fact that popen was disabled in the Lua hooks in monotone for security reasons. Here is a patch that replaces it with a security conscious version (like spawn() replaces execute()). The

[Monotone-devel] Re: re-licensing the monotone manual

2007-02-18 Thread Evan Deaubl
I have no issue with my contributions to monotone.texi (as small as they may be) being relicensed under the GPL (v2 or later). Evan Nathaniel Smith wrote: Currently, the main monotone manual, 'monotone.texi' in the source tree, is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). Now,

[Monotone-devel] Re: re-licensing the monotone manual

2007-02-18 Thread Grahame Bowland
On 19/02/07, Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PLEASE REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, CC'ING monotone-devel@nongnu.org, AND SAY THAT YOU ARE FINE WITH YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS TO monotone.texi BEING RELEASED UNDER THE GPL (v2 or later). I am fine with my contributions to monotone.texi being

[Monotone-devel] Re: re-licensing the monotone manual

2007-02-18 Thread Matt Johnston
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 06:42:03PM -0800, Nathaniel Smith wrote: So we want to change the license on monotone.texi to be GPL. This is a boring and annoying change to make, which is why we've been letting it slide for months and months, but... it really should happen. So. If you're getting

[Monotone-devel] Re: re-licensing the monotone manual

2007-02-18 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:42:03 -0800, Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: njs PLEASE REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, CC'ING monotone-devel@nongnu.org, AND njs SAY THAT YOU ARE FINE WITH YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS TO monotone.texi BEING njs RELEASED UNDER THE GPL (v2 or later).

[Monotone-devel] Re: re-licensing the monotone manual

2007-02-18 Thread Thomas Keller
Nathaniel Smith schrieb: PLEASE REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, CC'ING monotone-devel@nongnu.org, AND SAY THAT YOU ARE FINE WITH YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS TO monotone.texi BEING RELEASED UNDER THE GPL (v2 or later). I'm absolutely fine to relicense any contributions I made to monotone.texi under GNU GPL

[Monotone-devel] Re: re-licensing the monotone manual

2007-02-18 Thread Florian Weimer
* Nathaniel Smith: PLEASE REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, CC'ING monotone-devel@nongnu.org, AND SAY THAT YOU ARE FINE WITH YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS TO monotone.texi BEING RELEASED UNDER THE GPL (v2 or later). I'm fine with relicensing my (minor) contributions under the GNU GPL, version 2 or later.

[Monotone-devel] Re: re-licensing the monotone manual

2007-02-18 Thread Marcel van der Boom
On 19 feb 2007, at 03:42, Nathaniel Smith wrote: PLEASE REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, CC'ING monotone-devel@nongnu.org, AND SAY THAT YOU ARE FINE WITH YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS TO monotone.texi BEING RELEASED UNDER THE GPL (v2 or later). I'm fine with my contributions to monotone.texi being released

[Monotone-devel] Re: re-licensing the monotone manual

2007-02-18 Thread Matthew A. Nicholson
Nathaniel Smith wrote: PLEASE REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, CC'ING monotone-devel@nongnu.org, AND SAY THAT YOU ARE FINE WITH YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS TO monotone.texi BEING RELEASED UNDER THE GPL (v2 or later). I am fine with my contributions to monotone.texi being released under the GPL (v2 or