Re: [Monotone-devel] Makefile problem; check-local?

2007-08-30 Thread Stephen Leake
Zack Weinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 8/29/07, Stephen Leake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] I'm using the MinGW distribution, as described on the monotone Wiki, updated just a month ago. This doesn't answer the question, I'm afraid. The problem seems to be resolved, but what I wanted

Re: [Monotone-devel] Makefile problem; check-local?

2007-08-30 Thread Zack Weinberg
On 8/30/07, Stephen Leake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sh-2.04$ make --version GNU Make version 3.79.1, by Richard Stallman and Roland McGrath. Built for i686-pc-msys Ok, good, that's newer than the last version with really bad bugs that I know about. ;-) zw

Re: [Monotone-devel] problem with tester on WIN32 MinGW

2007-08-30 Thread Stephen Leake
Jack Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 06:21:55AM -0400, Stephen Leake wrote: I'm not very familiar with C++ debugging. I'm using gdb from the AdaCore distribution (there isn't one in the MinGW distribution); it understands C++, but break exception isn't a recognized

[Monotone-devel] emacs merge on Win32

2007-08-30 Thread Stephen Leake
When monotone needs help merging, it uses the following to launch emacs: local elisp = (ediff-merge-files-with-ancestor \%s\ \%s\ \%s\ nil \%s\) local ret = execute(emacs, --eval, string.format(elisp, tbl.lfile, tbl.rfile, tbl.afile, tbl.outfile)) This fails on Win32, because the

Re: [Monotone-devel] problem with tester on WIN32 MinGW

2007-08-30 Thread Zack Weinberg
On 8/30/07, Stephen Leake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] So I added an error message in the exception handler: catch (std::exception e) { E(false, F(error running test %s: %s) % testname % e.what()); retcode = 124; It reports: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ./tester.exe -r

Re: [Monotone-devel] problem with tester on WIN32 MinGW

2007-08-30 Thread Stephen Leake
Zack Weinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 8/30/07, Stephen Leake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Should I commit that change in tester.cc posix_umask, or is there a better solution? I think 'umask' isn't meaningful on Win32. Yes, please commit the change to posix_umask. It is indeed not

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Windows version 0.36

2007-08-30 Thread Derek Scherger
J Decker wrote: This is only new as of 0.36... previously any locks were unlocked... this is more like a sign that some query is left hanging instead of being completed. It's not that I'm attempting to use it at the same time, but, again previously, I could push/pull from the database and

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Windows version 0.36

2007-08-30 Thread Daniel Carosone
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 09:09:09PM -0600, Derek Scherger wrote: I don't know of anything that changed regarding database locks in the 0.35 - 0.36 timeframe As a minimum, sqlite itself was upgraded. -- Dan. pgpOTU02KhuJ1.pgp Description: PGP signature