I'm happy to announce that monotone 0.20 is now released, and
available as usual from the monotone homepage:
http://venge.net/monotone/
Source and some binaries are available now; more binaries will be
posted as I receive them.
The most visible change in this release is that netsync's branch
Nathaniel Smith writes:
0.20 release. features, ui improvements, performance
improvements, and bug fixes.
[...]
- where you used to say, e.g., monotone pull
net.venge.monotone, you should instead say monotone
pull net.venge.monotone*. This may require
Peter Simons writes:
Nathaniel Smith writes:
0.20 release. features, ui improvements, performance
improvements, and bug fixes.
[...]
- where you used to say, e.g., monotone pull
net.venge.monotone, you should instead say monotone
pull net.venge.monotone*. This may
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 13:25, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Source and some binaries are available now; more binaries will be
posted as I receive them.
ArchLinux package updated.
--
Best regards,
Stanislav Karchebny
Skype name: berkus
Get skype for free from www.skype.com
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 12:47:27PM +0200, Peter Simons wrote:
Nathaniel Smith writes:
0.20 release. features, ui improvements, performance
improvements, and bug fixes.
[...]
- where you used to say, e.g., monotone pull
net.venge.monotone, you should instead say
After upgrading to the latest version from venge.net
(44ed8807bead656889fb5022f974e13a7169098c), I see junk when
listing the database variables:
$ monotone ls vars
database: default-collection net.venge.monotone
database: default-pattern net.venge.monotone
database: default-server off.net
Peter Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After upgrading to the latest version from venge.net
(44ed8807bead656889fb5022f974e13a7169098c), I see junk when
listing the database variables:
$ monotone ls vars
database: default-collection net.venge.monotone
database: default-pattern
Hi all,
I'm afraid I can't get the source d/l from
http://www.venge.net/monotone/downloads/monotone-0.20.tar.gz; to
compile on neither Gentoo Linux (i686) nor Solaris 8 (Sparc). They both
give similar errors.
I have GCC 3.3.5 on Gentoo and GCC 3.4 on Solaris, the optimisations I
use on Gentoo
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 02:50:34PM +0100, Will Robertson wrote:
Hi all,
I'm afraid I can't get the source d/l from
http://www.venge.net/monotone/downloads/monotone-0.20.tar.gz; to
compile on neither Gentoo Linux (i686) nor Solaris 8 (Sparc). They both
give similar errors.
...
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
The most visible change in this release is that netsync's branch
handling has been revamped. This fixes a number of bugs, and removes
a significant source of confusion; now, rather than specifying
collections that must exactly match between the client and server,
both
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Thomas -- FYI, I tweaked debian/{control,rules} slightly for the 0.20
release; 44ed8807bead656889fb5022f974e13a7169098c has the changes. In
particular, we currently cannot use the unbundled sqlite, because we
have some local changes that are not yet migrated upstream. I
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 22:13 +0800, Matt Johnston wrote:
Will Robertson [Wednesday 6 July 2005] :
Hi all,
I'm afraid I can't get the source d/l from
http://www.venge.net/monotone/downloads/monotone-0.20.tar.gz; to
compile on neither Gentoo Linux (i686) nor Solaris 8 (Sparc). They
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 06 Jul 2005 19:45:37 +0200, Florian
Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
fw * Richard Levitte:
fw
fw I wonder why the release number is 0.1 instead of 1. Is there a
fw reason, or is this a typo, or something I haven't understood about
fw Debian release
On 2005-07-06, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
Hmm, the link to the dpkg is incorrect, it should be
downloads/monotone_0.20-0.1_i386.deb instead of
downloads/monotone_0.20-1_i386.deb .
I wonder why the release number is 0.1 instead of 1. Is there a
reason, or is this a typo, or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Richard.
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker skrev:
Hmm, the link to the dpkg is incorrect, it should be
downloads/monotone_0.20-0.1_i386.deb instead of
downloads/monotone_0.20-1_i386.deb .
I wonder why the release number is 0.1 instead of 1. Is
As per instructions I report a failure, testsuite.log attached.
Computer: a linux laptop sold by linuxcertified.com.
OS: SuSE 9.3 with
gcc-c++-3.3.5-5
boost-devel-1.32.0-3
boost-jam-3.1.4-127
boost-1.32.0-3
installed from the
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 07:39:56PM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
Hmm, the link to the dpkg is incorrect, it should be
downloads/monotone_0.20-0.1_i386.deb instead of
downloads/monotone_0.20-1_i386.deb .
Thanks. Fixed.
-- Nathaniel
--
Details are all that matters; God dwells
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 01:45:27PM +0200, Peter Simons wrote:
After upgrading to the latest version from venge.net
(44ed8807bead656889fb5022f974e13a7169098c), I see junk when
listing the database variables:
$ monotone ls vars
database: default-collection net.venge.monotone
database:
Hi,
here is an other goodie: monotone ls changed
will return a list with all files (no renamed/deleted directories)
that are changed. When developing on large projects I like to review
(grep, edit) the list with changed files before running a
xargs-{diff,commit}.
Have fun
Leif
#
# add_file
A monotone db got, somehow, certs on a revision which had bad
signatures. This happened during a learning session where a person
had probably mixed several keys.
After him pushing, which apparently went well, the messages with
warning: ignoring bad signature on appeared.
How come
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:13:00AM -0500, Matthew A. Nicholson wrote:
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
The most visible change in this release is that netsync's branch
handling has been revamped. This fixes a number of bugs, and removes
a significant source of confusion; now, rather than specifying
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:09:38PM +0200, Leif Jakob wrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 06:51:13PM -0700 Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Can you add docs and a test? monotone.texi for docs, tests/README for
tests...
yes
Awesome, thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] monotone restore_missing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 12:36:38AM +0200, Leif Jakob wrote:
Hi,
here is an other goodie: monotone ls changed
will return a list with all files (no renamed/deleted directories)
that are changed. When developing on large projects I like to review
(grep, edit) the list with changed files
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 01:21:13AM +0200, Marcel van der Boom wrote:
A monotone db got, somehow, certs on a revision which had bad
signatures. This happened during a learning session where a person
had probably mixed several keys.
After him pushing, which apparently went well, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nathaniel Smith skrev:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:19:44AM -0500, Matthew A. Nicholson wrote:
The package should also Build-Depend on texinfo. Here is a patch.
I'll let Tomas take care of this; debian/ doesn't need more cooks :-)
Sorry for a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew A. Nicholson skrev:
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Thomas -- FYI, I tweaked debian/{control,rules} slightly for the 0.20
release; 44ed8807bead656889fb5022f974e13a7169098c has the changes. In
particular, we currently cannot use the unbundled
26 matches
Mail list logo
