[Monotone-devel] Re: ~/.monotone/keys , privkey packets

2005-09-20 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 16:39 -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to implement ~/.monotone/keys/ . Since a privkey without its > pubkey isn't very useful, I want to make it store key pairs, not lone > privkeys. In order for this to work, monotone would have to not be able > to inpu

[Monotone-devel] ~/.monotone/keys , privkey packets

2005-09-20 Thread Timothy Brownawell
Hi, I'm trying to implement ~/.monotone/keys/ . Since a privkey without its pubkey isn't very useful, I want to make it store key pairs, not lone privkeys. In order for this to work, monotone would have to not be able to input a private key without its pubkey. So, I'd like to *replace* the 'privk

Re: [PATCH] Re: [Monotone-devel] .mt-template implementation

2005-09-20 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 01:37:35AM +1000, Badai Aqrandista wrote: > > Hi, > > This is a patch to use .mt-template as MT/log's template. > > Any comments? Looks very nice! Just a few small requests: - N(log_message.find_first_not_of(" \r\t\n") != string::npos, -F("empty log messag

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Cvssync status

2005-09-20 Thread Lapo Luchini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christof Petig wrote: > Neither FreeBSD nor Cygwin is Win32. Both should work out of the box. > I'm talking about a platform without fork and where newline conversion > is the default (MinGW). Though Cygwin can create Win32 (MinGW) executables. You're

[PATCH] Re: [Monotone-devel] .mt-template implementation

2005-09-20 Thread Badai Aqrandista
Hi, This is a patch to use .mt-template as MT/log's template. Any comments? --- Badai Aqrandista Cheepy (?) From: Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: monotone-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] .mt-template implementation Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 16:03:06 -0700 On Sat, Sep

[Monotone-devel] Re: Cvssync status

2005-09-20 Thread Lapo Luchini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Florian Weimer wrote: >>Can you say how it handles a CVS history where some files have been >>re-tagged? > Is re-tagging visible in the CVS repository at all? AFAIK/AFAIR tags are *not* versioned, in CVS. - -- L a p o L u c h i n i l a p o @ l a p