On 1 okt 2005, at 5:03, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Just a guess, but what happens if you put a transaction guard around
the whole chunk? (OS X has extra-paranoid disk-flushing stuff, that
makes wrapping multiple writes into a single transaction _very_
important. I don't know why it would matter
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 08:44:14PM -0700, Howard Spindel wrote:
I find it a bit reassuring to get the non-brief status, especially
when there is nothing to do and the brief status simply returns to
the command prompt with no output.
Ah, okay, actually I think that particular thing is a bug
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 10:00:30AM +0200, Marcel van der Boom wrote:
I dont think the direct problem is in monotone itself, even if run on
an otherwise minimal system, the monotone process is basically doing
nothing, cpu/mem wise. Gonna try to find with Shark (osx profiler
app) what the
On 1 okt 2005, at 11:35, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Oh, sure, it's obviously waiting on IO. The question is what IO are
we doing that takes so long, and how can we not do that :-).
I took a fresh copy of the database from the server. The problem
completely disappears with that new db file
* Nathaniel Smith:
Oh, sure, it's obviously waiting on IO. The question is what IO are
we doing that takes so long, and how can we not do that :-).
It's probably the effect of internal database fragmentation, coupled
with file system fragementation:
monotone.db: 8686 extents found,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Source Mage GNU/Linux monotone package has been updated, thanks.
:)
- -sandalle
- --
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/
Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, okay, actually I think that particular thing is a bug in --brief
-- IMO it should print no changes if there are no changes, similar
to what 'monotone diff' does.
Hmm... It all depends upon which philosophies you follow for UI
design. Are you
Just wanted to send you all a simple Thanks! for providing such a
great tool! The more I use monotone, the more I like it. There is
always an adjustment period, during which time I should have probably
kept my mouth shut on the development list. ;-) Strike my suggestion
for INI-style output,
