On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:26:32AM -0700, Conrad Steenberg wrote:
> Hi Nathaniel
>
> Another alternative might be to have a utility to convert x509 certs and
> their associated private keys to the format monotone uses, and then use
> the former for SSL tunneling. If monotone is using RSA keys, it
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 12:52:26AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> > Hrm. Do you have any better suggestions? There just aren't that many
> > plausible pattern matching syntaxes out there, AFAIK...
>
> SQL "like" syntax!
>
> monotone server %
Err, hmm, of course. I gue
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 02:32:32AM +0200, Bruno Hertz wrote:
> > As a sidenote, this will happen more often as monotone becomes more
> > widespread, since ppl tend to be confused by tools which implement
> > their own globbing syntax (cf. 'find'). Especially so when it's
>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 02:32:32AM +0200, Bruno Hertz wrote:
> As a sidenote, this will happen more often as monotone becomes more
> widespread, since ppl tend to be confused by tools which implement
> their own globbing syntax (cf. 'find'). Especially so when it's
> differing from shell semantics
Hendrik Boom spake unto us the following wisdom:
> I'm in the position of needing a better diff -- I have multiple
> versions of text files. I need to compare them, and of course diff is
> led hopelessly astray by the fact that small changes in a paragraph
> have caused line breaks to move to diffe
Matthew Gregan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 2005-10-12T01:17:27+0200, Wim Oudshoorn wrote:
>> When I server all branches with
>>
>> monotone serve 0.0.0.0 *
>>
>> I can not sync from other computers, I get an error
>> something like:
>>
>> access denied due to branch xxx.yyy
>>
>> Using m
At 2005-10-12T01:17:27+0200, Wim Oudshoorn wrote:
> When I server all branches with
>
> monotone serve 0.0.0.0 *
>
> I can not sync from other computers, I get an error
> something like:
>
> access denied due to branch xxx.yyy
>
> Using monotone version 0.23.
> Is this known?
You need to esca
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 01:17 +0200, Wim Oudshoorn wrote:
> When I server all branches with
>
> monotone serve 0.0.0.0 *
>
> I can not sync from other computers, I get an error
> something like:
>
> access denied due to branch xxx.yyy
>
> Using monotone version 0.23.
> Is this known?
Your shell
Is your shell expanding *? I would think the command should be
monotone serve 0.0.0.0 '*'
-emile
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 01:17 +0200, Wim Oudshoorn wrote:
> When I server all branches with
>
> monotone serve 0.0.0.0 *
>
> I can not sync from other computers, I get an error
> something like:
>
Color me impatient. I got one thumbs up on IRC, and the quickies file
is supposed to be all uncontroversial items, so I committed. Just
consider the email fair warning of the change in usage (it can bite you
because the old command form is still valid, but it uses what you intend
to be the addres
When I server all branches with
monotone serve 0.0.0.0 *
I can not sync from other computers, I get an error
something like:
access denied due to branch xxx.yyy
Using monotone version 0.23.
Is this known?
If not I will write a more detailed report.
Wim Oudshoorn.
I gather that monotone uses a better file-differencing algorithm
than the widely known one distributed as diff -- for one thing,
it can handle binary files.
I'm in the position of needing a better diff -- I have multiple versions
of text files. I need to compare them, and of course diff is led hop
At 2005-10-11T19:12:58+0200, Thomas Moschny wrote:
> The method explain_usage() in commands.cc prints translated strings for
> the command groups, but it uses the untranslated message-ids for computing
> the layout, so the result may look ugly in a non-en_US locale. For
> example:
> The attached
Hi all,
Below is a patch, per the venge.net/monotone/quickies.html list, to
change the monotone serve syntax from
monotone serve ADDRESS[:PORT] PATTERN ...
to
monotone [--bind=[ADDRESS:]PORT] serve PATTERN ...
where, if you leave out ADDRESS it listens on all interfaces, which is
also the defa
At 2005-10-11T10:32:15+0100, Malte Thoma wrote:
> After a 'mt db migrate' monotone sees more private keys than there are ..
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/wissenschaft/uk.ac.bas.bibliography> mt push
> monotone: misuse: you have multiple private keys
> monotone: misuse: pick one to use for signatures by
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:43:22PM +0200, Zbynek Winkler wrote:
> I see that the 0.22 package uploaded to debian unstable depends on
> boost1.33 that does seem to be getting into testing :(. So I've
> downloaded the 0.23 packages from the monotone website. That depends on
> 1.32. Is this what is
Chad Walstrom wrote:
Zbynek Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've converted to Mercurial and I had 2 main reasons:
1) not being able to compile monotone with gcc -- Mercurial is in Python
I believe there are pre-compiled, static binaries floating about, and
RPM and DEB packages pro
Hi Nathaniel
Another alternative might be to have a utility to convert x509 certs and
their associated private keys to the format monotone uses, and then use
the former for SSL tunneling. If monotone is using RSA keys, it could be
(almost) trivial.
The advantage is that x509 is supported by a lot
I don't have any particular plans to implement it myself, and
writing my own crypto protocol makes me Very Very Nervous. And SSL
and SSH libraries seem to be uniformly horrid.
I haven't looked at any SSH ones, but OpenSSL doesn't seem too
horrible---I'd guess it's not much more horrible t
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:57:02AM +0100, Joel Crisp wrote:
Is there a reason why this has to be integrated in Monotone rather than
using tunneling?
Eh, there are some advantages to integrating it -- ssh tunneling
requires people have logins on the remote box, requires
Hi list,
The method explain_usage() in commands.cc prints translated strings for the
command groups, but it uses the untranslated message-ids for computing the
layout, so the result may look ugly in a non-en_US locale. For example:
$ env LC_MESSAGES=fr_FR.UTF-8 monotone
[...]
arborescence
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:57:02AM +0100, Joel Crisp wrote:
> Is there a reason why this has to be integrated in Monotone rather than
> using tunneling?
Eh, there are some advantages to integrating it -- ssh tunneling
requires people have logins on the remote box, requires they have ssh
installed
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 11 Oct 2005 14:27:30 +0200, Zbynek
Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
zwin> Oh! That is a big step towards using monotone on a multiuser
zwin> machine.
Hmm, I hadn't thought of it that way. For me, it's more of a security
concern, where I want different col
Jon Bright wrote:
Zbynek
Winkler wrote:
I also remember reading about some
"roasters"...?
"rosters"... though I've also no clue what they are.
I've been hanging out in the #monotone IRC channel, and believe I have
a basic theoretical understanding of "rosters", which I will now tr
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:03:45 +0200, Zbynek Winkler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
zwin> Could someone enlighten me about the new "usher code"? What is
zwin> it? I also remember reading about some "roasters"...?
usher is basically
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:03:45 +0200, Zbynek
Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
zwin> Could someone enlighten me about the new "usher code"? What is
zwin> it? I also remember reading about some "roasters"...?
usher is basically an umbrella process that routes incoming
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 11 Oct 2005 11:57:02 +0100, Joel Crisp
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
jcrisp> Is there a reason why this has to be integrated in Monotone
jcrisp> rather than using tunneling?
Not really, but we're still waiting for the .ssh branch to be finished
to make that a v
Zbynek Winkler wrote:
Could someone enlighten me about the new "usher code"? What is it? I
also remember reading about some "roasters"...?
"rosters"... though I've also no clue what they are.
--
Jon Bright
Silicon Circus Ltd.
http://www.siliconcircus.com
___
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 10:07:36AM -0500, Chad Walstrom wrote:
In any case, I'm committed to using Monotone now. I'm looking forward
to the usher code and cvssync code making its way into the main tree.
;-) Great work guys!
Usher code is not only in the main tre
Is there a reason why this has to be integrated in Monotone rather than using
tunneling?
Joel
*SNIP*
___
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is very annoying :-(
After a 'mt db migrate' monotone sees more private keys than there are ..
Regards,
Malte
#
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/wissenschaft/uk.ac.bas.bibliography> mt p
31 matches
Mail list logo
