[Monotone-devel] Issue 138 - monotone should have a reference card (monotone)

2011-01-30 Thread code
Hello,

A new issue has been created and assigned
to you:

138 - monotone should have a reference card
Project: monotone
Status: New
Reported by: Stephen Leake
Labels:
 Priority:Low
 Type:wish

Description:

like http://www.cs.put.poznan.pl/csobaniec/edu/svn-refcard.pdf

Ideally, we need a formatting stream for the 'mtn man' command that produces a 
nice reference card.

--
Issue: https://code.monotone.ca/p/monotone/issues/138/

___
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel


Re: [Monotone-devel] policy for FIXME stuff in wiki?

2011-01-30 Thread Stephen Leake
Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz writes:

 Am 23.01.11 13:30, schrieb Stephen Leake:
 The wiki has several things that look like FIXME comments:
 
 For example, in ReferenceCard.mdwn [...]

 Unless somebody worked on this recently (and with recently I mean for
 the last 12 months), I'm all for removing these things altogether.
 Especially the referenced page contains no information which are of any
 use to do something like this. If at all this looks more like a feature
 request and somebody might consider adding an entry in the issue tracker
 for that. But given the fact that we still have no graphic wiz around,
 it will reside there unworked for long as well.

 So yes, please go ahead.

Ok.

In this case, I decided to simply delete the ReferenceCard. It's far
from complete, and I find the online help much easier to use, and
certainly easier to keep up to date. 

I added an issue for it. One approach is a formatting stream for the
'mtn man' command.

-- 
-- Stephe

___
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel


[Monotone-devel] nvm.source-tree-cleanup

2011-01-30 Thread Thomas Keller

Hi all!

Richard, Stephe and me polished the above branch over the last weeks and
got positive response from a couple of people that it works well for
them. For those who weren't following the previous development, this
branch is basically about moving stuff around into specific directories,
i.e. we now have a dedicated src/, test/ and doc/ directory and the
in-tree documentation has been sanitized accordingly.

There are a couple of minor issues left which kind of block the merge
back to nvm, one of them is the move of some innosetup-specific
resources out of src/win32 and another one deals with HTML
documentation. I'd still put the whole branch up for review now already
because I really want to see the work merged back in nvm to get even
more feedback and also to allow third parties (debian for example) adapt
their source trees according to our Makefile.am changes.

So please have a look at the changes in this branch and give us
feedback. If you think it is not a good idea to merge this into nvm yet,
then please also tell us. In case nobody places serious objections I'd
like to merge the branch by the end of next week (Friday'ish).

Many thanks!
Thomas.

-- 
GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | tommyd3...@jabber.ccc.de | http://thomaskeller.biz
Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information
on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period
of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel


Re: [Monotone-devel] nvm.source-tree-cleanup

2011-01-30 Thread Timothy Brownawell
On 01/30/2011 05:08 PM, Thomas Keller wrote:
 
 Hi all!
 
 Richard, Stephe and me polished the above branch over the last weeks and
 got positive response from a couple of people that it works well for
 them. For those who weren't following the previous development, this
 branch is basically about moving stuff around into specific directories,
 i.e. we now have a dedicated src/, test/ and doc/ directory and the
 in-tree documentation has been sanitized accordingly.
 
 There are a couple of minor issues left which kind of block the merge
 back to nvm, one of them is the move of some innosetup-specific
 resources out of src/win32 and another one deals with HTML
 documentation. I'd still put the whole branch up for review now already
 because I really want to see the work merged back in nvm to get even
 more feedback and also to allow third parties (debian for example) adapt
 their source trees according to our Makefile.am changes.
 
 So please have a look at the changes in this branch and give us
 feedback. If you think it is not a good idea to merge this into nvm yet,
 then please also tell us. In case nobody places serious objections I'd
 like to merge the branch by the end of next week (Friday'ish).

#include's use relative paths now, instead of absolute (base.hh in
src/ and ../base.hh in src/network, rather than src/base.hh
everywhere) -- except config.h is still config.h (and since it lives
in the build directory, a relative path ../config.h or
../../config.h won't work for it). I guess that seems reasonable.

A number of functions now have their return type reformatted onto a
separate line, that's perfectly fine but gives a bigger diff to look at.

make distcheck fails, apparently because make doc/monotone.ps fails
(but make doc/monotone.pdf works fine). This happens even with a
writable srcdir (ie, not limited to distcheck).

-- 
Timothy

Free public monotone hosting: http://mtn-host.prjek.net

___
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel


[Monotone-devel] Re: [Monotone-commits-diffs] net.venge.monotone.source-tree-cleanup: d54c8c17eeebbe7dd6bb30d4d10996db79de24f2

2011-01-30 Thread Richard Levitte
Stephen, with regards to this change, I'd like to know the background
for this:

  * Makefile.am (doc_monotone_TEXINFOS): move copy-html-deps
copy-pdf-deps out of this; they must be files in the 'dist'
target. Also delete $(EPS_FIGURES); doesn't work on Win32, not
needed anyway

Most especially, I'd like to know how having $(EPS_FIGURES) in
$(doc_monotone_TEXINFOS) doesn't work on Win32.

Not having $(EPS_FIGURES) in $(doc_monotone_TEXINFOS) doesn't work
when trying to produce doc/monotone.dvi (which is needed to create
doc/monotone.ps).  The optimal thing would of course be if we could
have a line like this to express extra dependencies:

  doc/monotone.dvi: $(EPS_FIGURES)

Unfortunately, automake takes this as an override and will refuse to
generate a doc/monotone.dvi of its own...

In message 201101281209.p0sc9bmk035...@monotone.ca on Fri, 28 Jan 2011 
12:09:11 GMT, c...@monotone.ca said:

code revision:d54c8c17eeebbe7dd6bb30d4d10996db79de24f2
code date:2011-01-28T11:56:05
code author:  stephen_leak...@stephe-leake.org
code branch:  net.venge.monotone.source-tree-cleanup
code changelog:
code Clean up Makefile.am for dist, win32
code 
code * Makefile.am (doc_monotone_TEXINFOS): move copy-html-deps copy-pdf-deps 
out of this; they must be files in the 'dist' target. Also delete 
$(EPS_FIGURES); doesn't work on Win32, not needed anyway
code   (EXTRA_DIST): renamed win32/README
code   (doc/figures/%.ps): improve dependency chain, move copy-pdf-deps here
code   (doc/html): move copy-html-deps here
code   (dist-hook): add copy-html-deps copy-pdf-deps here
code 
code 
code manifest:
code format_version 1
code 
code new_manifest [82acd2ae8a0f450ece4ab4a36cebe4b886128c44]
code 
code old_revision [3627249c28749684bf092c5f1eaa5fa6788c94b1]
code 
code patch Makefile.am
code  from [cfc006c165b6e3eb214d4c176ce9217fafe69265]
codeto [6d33b4f8c99a9898ee999417e5e6141d0b46f2a4]

-- 
Richard Levitte rich...@levitte.org
http://richard.levitte.org/

Life is a tremendous celebration - and I'm invited!
-- from a friend's blog, translated from Swedish

___
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel


Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)

2011-01-30 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 02:22:37AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote:
 In message 20101119201102.ga25...@topoi.pooq.com on Fri, 19 Nov 2010 
 15:11:02 -0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said:
 
 hendrik (2) Is there a comment convention for the usher config file?
 
   comment This is a lengthy comment

The comment has to be in quotes?
Are newlines allowed?
Should this be documented in 
https://code.monotone.ca/p/contrib/page/UsherDocumentation/
?

-- hendrik

___
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel