In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:09:39 +0100, Jon Bright
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
jon ~$ monotone rev
jon monotone: The revert command must be typed in full
jon
jon How does that sound? Best of both worlds, or unwanted nannying?
The latter.
Cheers,
Richard
-
Please
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 10:59:34PM -0600, Chad Walstrom wrote:
For example, while commi will expand to commit today, it will
fail to do so tomorrow when we add the much requested commissar
appointment feature to monotone.
Then you get an error and learn that there's a new command
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:31:39 +1300, Matthew
Gregan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
kinetik While discussing the current behaviour of 'monotone revert'
kinetik (see Alex's email about the possibility of losing work too
kinetik easily) on #monotone, the idea of removing the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 13 Dec 2005 23:39:34 -0800, Nathaniel
Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
njs On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 10:59:34PM -0600, Chad Walstrom wrote:
njs For example, while commi will expand to commit today, it will
njs fail to do so tomorrow when we add the much
Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fingers are also effectively a scripting environment; I think the
other _monotone_ developers would lynch us if we tried to make them
relearn up or ci. Never mind the actual user base :-).
True. Very, very true, and thus why command names need to be
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 07:09:39PM +0100, Jon Bright wrote:
Hi,
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
I disagree with removing keyword expansion. I agree that some aliases
can be added to ensure that certain shortcuts always work.
I also disagree with removing keyword expansion on the
Hi list,
While discussing the current behaviour of 'monotone revert' (see Alex's
email about the possibility of losing work too easily) on #monotone, the
idea of removing the automatic command expansion from monotone was
discussed.
monotone currently accepts commands in three ways:
1.
Matthew Gregan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While discussing the current behaviour of 'monotone revert' (see
Alex's email about the possibility of losing work too easily) on
#monotone, the idea of removing the automatic command expansion from
monotone was discussed.
What?! Why?
3. By guessing
Chad Walstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aliases, on the other hand, are explicitly defined. This means
that they're less likely to change tomorrow, and that any change
that affected them is much more likely to be reflected in the
documentation and the monotone release notes.
Command
