Has this patch been proposed to the SQLite developer(s) by now? I see
no reason to wait if it hasn't.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 25 Jul 2005 17:25:00 +1200, Matthew
Gregan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
kinetik diff -u sqlite-3.2.2/src/tokenize.c
monotone/monotone-0.21/sqlite/tokenize.c
At 2005-07-26T13:25:24+0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
Has this patch been proposed to the SQLite developer(s) by now? I see
no reason to wait if it hasn't.
Not yet, for lack of time. I'd like to test an implementation of the
db::load stuff using sqlite3_prepare first, to see if
Hallo,
On 7/25/05, Matthew Gregan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 2005-07-25T02:35:04+0200, Tomas Fasth wrote:
I would very much like to resolve this issue in such a way that I
can begin to link monotone with the sqlite library as provided in
Debian.
Please refer to Graydon's earlier email
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 10:12:55AM -0300, Alex Queiroz wrote:
These are very different libraries. The Lua libraries are almost
meant to be customised. Regarding SQLite, I agree it'd be better to
use the Debian libraries, to keep monotone automatically more
up-to-date and secure.
--
Hallo,
On 7/25/05, Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 10:12:55AM -0300, Alex Queiroz wrote:
These are very different libraries. The Lua libraries are almost
meant to be customised. Regarding SQLite, I agree it'd be better to
use the Debian libraries, to
Hello
I maintain the monotone package in Debian. Monotone is using sqlite
for data storage. It is currently _not_ linked with the sqlite
shared library provided in Debian but instead linked with it's own
copy of sqlite. This is not a good thing from the package
maintainance and security point of
At 2005-07-25T02:35:04+0200, Tomas Fasth wrote:
My question to Andreas Rottmann is; Since sqlite version 3.2.2 is
not yet uploaded to the Debian unstable archive, is it possible to
incorporate the changes already made to the monotone version of the
sqlite source files?
I don't think it makes
