On Tuesday 17 January 2006 11:20, Henry Nestler wrote:
> C:\> monotone --version
> monotone 0.25 (base revision: unknown)
>
> C:\> monotone --db=monotone.db --key="" pull venge.net:4691
> net.venge.monotone
> [...]
> monotone: warning: protocol error while processing peer venge.net:4691:
> 'protoco
Hello,
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
I'm quite surprised everyone keeps pointing at mail messages when
there's a blatantly obvious lack of information on what I believe to
be the central point for anyone who seeks information:
http://www.venge.net/monotone/. There's not one character say
Richard Levitte writes:
> [There's] a blatantly obvious lack of information on what
> I believe to be the central point for anyone who seeks
> information: http://www.venge.net/monotone/.
I agree; it would be a good idea to update the self-hosting
pages.
That wouldn't have helped me either th
On Monday 16 January 2006 21:46, Peter Simons wrote:
> Nathaniel Smith writes:
>
> > Monotone 0.26pre1 has been released.
>
> I tried to connect to venge.net to get the revision tree,
> but the port seems to be blacklisted:
>
> | $ telnet venge.net 5253
> | Trying 66.96.28.3...
> | telnet: U
Nathaniel Smith writes:
> Monotone 0.26pre1 has been released.
I tried to connect to venge.net to get the revision tree,
but the port seems to be blacklisted:
| $ telnet venge.net 5253
| Trying 66.96.28.3...
| telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host
However:
| $ telnet
See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/monotone-devel/2006-01/msg00123.html
Peter Simons wrote:
Nathaniel Smith writes:
> Monotone 0.26pre1 has been released.
I tried to connect to venge.net to get the revision tree,
but the port seems to be blacklisted:
| $ telnet venge.net 5253
| Trying 66.