On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 09:29:17PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, a weave (SCCS's storage format) turns out to be remarkably
well-suited to this.
It would, however, be silly to clone SCCS's storage format exactly.
Of course that's not an issue
Nathan Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 09:29:17PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
I think it would be possible to make [the second half of an s.file]
append-only too, but that would probably hurt checkout performance.
... unless it started with the file position of the
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 11:00:51AM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
My suspicion is that you could re-sort the on-disk weave by version
number, like so
version 1 of line 1
version 1 of line 2
version 1 of line 3
...
version 2 of line 2
version 2 of line 4
...
version 3 of line 12
making
Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FYI:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.revctrl/2
Oh. If I understand correctly, then it sounds like the basic storage
that everone's using is suboptimal, and really SCMs should store a big
database of lines, and files get stored as
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 11:56:03PM +0100, Bruce Stephens wrote:
Nathaniel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FYI:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.revctrl/2
Oh. If I understand correctly, then it sounds like the basic storage
that everone's using is suboptimal, and
