On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 04:41:57PM -0700, Stephen Leake wrote:
> Hendrik Boom writes:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 08:54:25AM -0700, Stephen Leake wrote:
> >> Hendrik Boom writes:
> >>
> >> > Or is monotone development and maintenance truly dead and I need to
> >> > abandon ship and take
Hendrik Boom writes:
> On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 08:54:25AM -0700, Stephen Leake wrote:
>> Hendrik Boom writes:
>>
>> > Or is monotone development and maintenance truly dead and I need to
>> > abandon ship and take what data I ca with me?
>>
>> Just for reference, I gave up on monotone, and
>On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 05:51:38PM +0200, Michael Raskin wrote:
>> >Is anything being done about this?
>> >Is the current botan so incompatible that it's hopeless to adapt?
>> >
>> >Or is monotone development and maintenance truly dead and I need to
>> >abandon ship and take what data I ca with
On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 02:18:12PM +0100, CooSoft Support wrote:
> In my experience the merging in mtn presents the developer with far fewer
> conflicts to resolve. Plus you can merge multiple branches in one go by
> `baptising' those dev branches into the target developer/integration branch.
How
On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 12:53:11AM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> As people noted in last months / years... the worlds OS, apps,
> developers, and tech oriented operating system / repo / code / porters
> eyeballs users and interactors have more or less moved en masse
> to git, primarily on github, often
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 05:51:38PM +0200, Michael Raskin wrote:
> >Is anything being done about this?
> >Is the current botan so incompatible that it's hopeless to adapt?
> >
> >Or is monotone development and maintenance truly dead and I need to
> >abandon ship and take what data I ca with me?
>
In my experience the merging in mtn presents the developer with far
fewer conflicts to resolve. Plus you can merge multiple branches in one
go by `baptising' those dev branches into the target
developer/integration branch. So it doesn't stand out at first, you just
notice after a while that
I have used monotone for a few years and was fine with it.
I used to hear a lot and still hear now and then that the approach to
merging in monotone is / was superior to the approach taken in git. It is
something I have never understood. My experience with merges in monotone
is actually quite
I loved using Monotone and agree that the merging in mtn is far superior
to the run of the mill merging you get with git (after all it's site did
refer to it as a stupid/dumb content tracker). In fact mtn's merging is
the best I've ever used. I liked the fact that changesets were stored
>As people noted in last months / years... the worlds OS, apps,
>developers, and tech oriented operating system / repo / code / porters
>eyeballs users and interactors have more or less moved en masse
>to git, primarily on github, often augmented by running
>their own git copies in house if they
There are probably some patches to apply from all these repos...
https://repology.org/project/monotone/related
As people noted in last months / years... the worlds OS, apps,
developers, and tech oriented operating system / repo / code / porters
eyeballs users and interactors have more or less moved en masse
to git, primarily on github, often augmented by running
their own git copies in house if they are a
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 08:54:25AM -0700, Stephen Leake wrote:
> Hendrik Boom writes:
>
> > Or is monotone development and maintenance truly dead and I need to
> > abandon ship and take what data I ca with me?
>
> Just for reference, I gave up on monotone, and exported to git.
I stopped
Hendrik Boom writes:
> Or is monotone development and maintenance truly dead and I need to
> abandon ship and take what data I ca with me?
Just for reference, I gave up on monotone, and exported to git.
--
-- Stephe
>Is anything being done about this?
>Is the current botan so incompatible that it's hopeless to adapt?
>
>Or is monotone development and maintenance truly dead and I need to
>abandon ship and take what data I ca with me?
1. You can easily check out a branch that actually works with botan2.
I
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 06:05:09PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> Stephen Leake writes:
>
> > I've just installed a new Debian 10 VM, and upgraded to testing.
> >
> > 'aptitude search monotone' returns nothing!
> >
> > Is it finally time to stop using monotone?
>
> monotone has been removed from
16 matches
Mail list logo
