Am 04.05.10 16:18, schrieb Stephen Leake:
I'm trying to get the rev_id of a merge, in a Lua test. Can anyone tell
me why this doesn't work? I based it on base_revision().
function merged_revision()
local workrev = readfile(stderr)
local extract = string.gsub(workrev, ^mtn: %[merged%]
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz wrote:
In the meantime what I would really really want to get rid of are
boolean function arguments - so maybe you could start and make the code
a little easier to read by passing a more describable enum value...?
Agreed.
Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz writes:
Am 04.05.10 16:18, schrieb Stephen Leake:
I'm trying to get the rev_id of a merge, in a Lua test. Can anyone tell
me why this doesn't work? I based it on base_revision().
function merged_revision()
local workrev = readfile(stderr)
local
Okay, I've submitted my (largely superfluous) vote, which I hope isn't
skewed by being 8 hours off of everyone else :) From a rough sense of
things, I think I'd rather either the 9th or the 22-23rd, but however that
pans out. Looking forward to it.
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Thomas Keller
Stephen Leake stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org writes:
Stephen Leake stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org writes:
Mando Rodriguez mandorodrig...@gmail.com writes:
When attempting to perform a merge we get this :
/
mtn: 2 heads on branch '0'
mtn: merge 1 / 1:
mtn: calculating best pair of heads
Hi everyone!
I'd like to announce the second iteration of the monotone bug hunt day.
This happening will take place between
Sat 08.05. 18:00 UTC and Sun 09.05. 18:00 UTC
which should lead to the most appearances (14) of interested developers.
Please ensure that you have a Savannah
Am 05.05.2010 07:11, schrieb Derek Scherger:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz wrote:
And of course I'd remove Revision: and Parent: from the editable area to
make it even less verbose, but we've had this discussion before and as I
said I'm happy already that
Am 05.05.10 09:13, schrieb Stephen Leake:
Stephen Leake stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org writes:
Stephen Leake stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org writes:
Mando Rodriguez mandorodrig...@gmail.com writes:
When attempting to perform a merge we get this :
/
mtn: 2 heads on branch '0'
mtn: merge
Am 05.05.10 09:02, schrieb Stephen Leake:
Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz writes:
Am 04.05.10 16:18, schrieb Stephen Leake:
I'm trying to get the rev_id of a merge, in a Lua test. Can anyone tell
me why this doesn't work? I based it on base_revision().
function merged_revision()
Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz writes:
Am 05.05.10 09:13, schrieb Stephen Leake:
Stephen Leake stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org writes:
Stephen Leake stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org writes:
Mando Rodriguez mandorodrig...@gmail.com writes:
When attempting to perform a merge we get this
syncing with 0.47 server results on the client
mtn.EXE: warning: protocol error while processing peer hostname:
'received network error: denied
'c64200903a4402fff7dcf6343d0290dfbecb5713' write permission for '*'
excluding '''
doing a quick serch for 'monotone sync 0.47' comes up with
Stephen Leake stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org writes:
Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz writes:
Am 04.05.10 16:18, schrieb Stephen Leake:
I'm trying to get the rev_id of a merge, in a Lua test. Can anyone tell
me why this doesn't work? I based it on base_revision().
function
12 matches
Mail list logo
