On 11/27/2015 07:03 AM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
I'm specfically looking to find out how to get usher to reread the
configuration file.
It tries to be a good Unix daemon, and catches SIGHUP for this. There's
also a command thru usherctl.
Either it didn't work, or I don't know how to SUGHUP.
I
On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 21:40:06 -0600, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
> On 11/21/2015 07:47 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>> Where does usher documentation hide out now?
> It's in doc/documentation.html . I don't know that this is available
> online anywhere other than thru viewmtn.
Found it in the source
On 11/21/2015 07:47 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
Where does usher documentation hide out now?
It's in doc/documentation.html . I don't know that this is available
online anywhere other than thru viewmtn.
I'm specfically looking to fine out how to get usher to reread the
configuration file.
It
On Fri, 25 May 2012 15:59:51 +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
Is there a reason for usher to keep a database locked after the netsync
is finished?
I just sync'd from my laptop to my server using usher; a subsequent
attempt to checkout on the server (witout usher, of course) failed
because the
In message 20110203072618.ga27...@topoi.pooq.com on Thu, 3 Feb 2011 02:26:18
-0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said:
hendrik On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 12:09:23AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote:
hendrik In message 20110201200533.ga8...@topoi.pooq.com on Tue, 1 Feb 2011
15:05:33 -0500,
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:28:06AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote:
In message 20110203072618.ga27...@topoi.pooq.com on Thu, 3 Feb 2011
02:26:18 -0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said:
When it comes to automatic starts, such as starting a monotone server
under usher, this is of course
In message 20110203160429.ga5...@topoi.pooq.com on Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:04:29
-0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said:
hendrik I don't really see a big difference between the script being
hendrik protected and the separate file being protected. Unless the
hendrik file with the scripts
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 12:09:23AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote:
In message 20110201200533.ga8...@topoi.pooq.com on Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:05:33
-0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said:
In your configuration file, you have a logdir setting. You might want
to look at the log file there
In message 20110201200533.ga8...@topoi.pooq.com on Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:05:33
-0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said:
hendrik On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 02:04:46PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
hendrik
hendrik I guess now comes the inevitable flood of stupid questions as i try
to
hendrik
In message 20110131075604.ga14...@topoi.pooq.com on Mon, 31 Jan 2011 02:56:04
-0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said:
hendrik On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 02:22:37AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote:
hendrik In message 20101119201102.ga25...@topoi.pooq.com on Fri, 19 Nov
2010 15:11:02 -0500,
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 02:22:37AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote:
In message 20101119201102.ga25...@topoi.pooq.com on Fri, 19 Nov 2010
15:11:02 -0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said:
hendrik (2) Is there a comment convention for the usher config file?
comment This is a lengthy
Actually, never mind that. A little more mind twisting and I got how
to do this:
server .catchall.
pattern
local --confdir=/etc/monotone --db=/var/lib/monotone/default.mtn
--no-standard-rcfiles --rcfile=/etc/monotone/hooks.lua
--keydir=/var/lib/monotone/keys
It plays perfectly together
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 02:04:46PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
I guess now comes the inevitable flood of stupid questions as i try to
make sense of the documentation.
More stupid question.
(1) The listen addr in the sample script is 0.0.0.0:4691.
The 4691 is the usual monotone port
In message 20101119201102.ga25...@topoi.pooq.com on Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:11:02
-0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said:
hendrik (1) The listen addr in the sample script is 0.0.0.0:4691.
hendrik
hendrikThe 4691 is the usual monotone port number.
hendrik
hendrikBut I'm not
On 11/09/2010 10:31 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 08:50:26PM -0600, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
On 11/08/2010 01:49 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as
On 11/08/2010 01:49 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as
usher-0.99 available from
mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher
and there is a tarball available at
On 11/08/2010 01:04 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as
usher-0.99 available from
mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher
and there is a tarball available at
On 11/08/2010 12:36 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
Well, I did download the tarball,
http://mtn-host.prjek.net/projects/webhost/files/usher-0.99.tar.gz
and untarred it. The README file says
The documentation is in doc/documentation.html.
But there is no doc directory to be found in the
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 08:50:26PM -0600, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
On 11/08/2010 01:49 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as
usher-0.99 available from
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as
usher-0.99 available from
mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher
This is what I've been waiting for! But my browser had other ideas ...
You
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as
usher-0.99 available from
mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher
and there is a tarball available at
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as
usher-0.99 available from
mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher
and there is a tarball available at
Am 08.11.10 19:36, schrieb Hendrik Boom:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as
usher-0.99 available from
mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher
This is what I've been waiting for!
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 06:36:38AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote:
This is a piece of software I'd like to see debianised...
I see there's an ld debian branch...
I wonder whether it should be a replacement for
monotone-server. In function, if not in name.
-- hendrik
This is a piece of software I'd like to see debianised...
I see there's an ld debian branch...
Cheers,
Richard
In message 4cd4dd8b.4080...@prjek.net on Fri, 05 Nov 2010 23:46:03 -0500,
Timothy Brownawell tbrow...@prjek.net said:
tbrownaw There is an actual release of usher available now.
Am 11.06.2010 00:26, schrieb Timothy Brownawell:
On 06/09/2010 07:21 AM, Thomas Keller wrote:
Am 17.04.2010 17:39, schrieb Timothy Brownawell:
On 04/15/2010 02:13 AM, Thomas Keller wrote:
Let's concentrate first to put usher in a release-capable state so
packagers (like me :) can pick it up.
On 06/09/2010 07:21 AM, Thomas Keller wrote:
Am 17.04.2010 17:39, schrieb Timothy Brownawell:
On 04/15/2010 02:13 AM, Thomas Keller wrote:
Let's concentrate first to put usher in a release-capable state so
packagers (like me :) can pick it up. If it packaged I'll have a much
easier way to
Am 17.04.2010 17:39, schrieb Timothy Brownawell:
On 04/15/2010 02:13 AM, Thomas Keller wrote:
Let's concentrate first to put usher in a release-capable state so
packagers (like me :) can pick it up. If it packaged I'll have a much
easier way to convince the guys over there at indefero some
On 04/15/2010 02:13 AM, Thomas Keller wrote:
Am 15.04.2010 04:50, schrieb Timothy Brownawell:
Finally, what speaks against integrating usher in monotone's base
completly?
As in make it all a single binary? Not sure what the benefit would be,
Well, I haven't looked at the code and its
On 04/15/2010 07:59 AM, Thomas Keller wrote:
Am 15.04.2010 13:33, schrieb Thomas Keller:
I played around with [mtn://-style uris] further, there are a couple of serious
bugs in
this feature. Apparently the uri scheme only works if a port (and may it
only be the standard port 4691) is given and
Am 15.04.2010 04:50, schrieb Timothy Brownawell:
Maybe there is a third way, which would require changes in monotone
though: what about picking the database / server to use for netsync
directly from the client? I vaguely remember that we introduced an URL
schema in monotone a couple of
Am 15.04.2010 09:13, schrieb Thomas Keller:
Am 15.04.2010 04:50, schrieb Timothy Brownawell:
Maybe there is a third way, which would require changes in monotone
though: what about picking the database / server to use for netsync
directly from the client? I vaguely remember that we introduced
Am 15.04.2010 13:33, schrieb Thomas Keller:
I played around with [mtn://-style uris] further, there are a couple of
serious bugs in
this feature. Apparently the uri scheme only works if a port (and may it
only be the standard port 4691) is given and thats also the reason why
the tests don't
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 09:50:08PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
On 04/14/2010 02:29 AM, Thomas Keller wrote:
Thats right - I also wondered if its worthwhile to merge-into-dir usher
to the main monotone tree and include it in the base distribution. Usher
makes only very very little sense
Hi Tim!
Am 14.04.2010 04:44, schrieb Timothy Brownawell:
What happens if somebody pulls or pushes changes with com.project* or
some other wildcard-using pattern to the server? Would this fail because
neither server would be able to respond? What would happen for a pattern
like
On 04/14/2010 02:29 AM, Thomas Keller wrote:
While the DNS-/hostname-based approach seems to be the best way to
distinguish different projects, its not always possible to configure
that easily, even though only a wildcard DNS entry is needed. I'm
currently (seriously) looking into integrating
On 04/13/2010 07:12 PM, Thomas Keller wrote:
Hi!
I know usher is around for quite a long time now, but I just started
playing with it tonight. One thing I don't quite get is how instance
separation based on pattern matching is supposed to work - imagine you
have these two different setups
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 20 Jun 2006 19:35:27 +0200, Marcel van
der Boom [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
marcel While deploying i updated the usher.txt (README) file.
Patch applied, and on server_manager.cc as well.
Cheers,
Richard
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 11:19:19PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 23:29 -0300, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
And even if I try to make it match against pattern, it fails,
because of the way operator== works for struct prefix. Is this
intentional? Shouldn't it also do
Also...
I just realized from the email I sent that usher is also not
requiring the USERPASS command befor LIST and STATUS, and probably
before any other command.
Also, I tried to use a wrong username and password, and usher did
not close the connection.
J.
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 12:22 -0300, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
Hi.
I just compiled usher, and started it:
$ ./usher -m mtn -kmy_key -a 127.0.0.1:1 usher.cfg
It treats the -m argument as an executable name, not a command line. So
it'll be looking for an execuable named mtn -kmy_key, not
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 06:16:36PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 12:22 -0300, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
Hi.
I just compiled usher, and started it:
$ ./usher -m mtn -kmy_key -a 127.0.0.1:1 usher.cfg
It treats the -m argument as an executable name, not a
Right now I just need to find out why usher can't find the server, but
it will eventually work. :-)
I found it.
If I use:
server main
host localhost
pattern info.aleph0
local -d /home/jeronimo/monotone/main.db *
And try to sync brahch:
info.aleph0.my_branch
Neither if I try:
server main
OK, I'll compile the problems I found before:
If I use:
server main
host localhost
pattern info.aleph0
local -d /home/jeronimo/monotone/main.db *
And try to sync brahch info.aleph0.my_branch
It won't work.
Neither if I try:
pattern info.aleph0.*
But if I use:
pattern
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 23:29 -0300, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
OK, I'll compile the problems I found before:
If I use:
server main
host localhost
pattern info.aleph0
local -d /home/jeronimo/monotone/main.db *
And try to sync brahch info.aleph0.my_branch
It won't work.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:09:52 +0200 (CEST),
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
richard In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:48:49 -0400,
Ethan Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
richard
richard eblanton Second, with both the usher from
46 matches
Mail list logo
