On Tuesday 18 January 2005 19:50, Sean Davis wrote:
> Yes, they are. I was merely running the suggested evals. No need to "RTFM"
> at me. I'm quite aware that type names are integers. I merely found the
> results of those tests... curious... for lack of a better word.
I doubt he was trying to be r
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 07:18:04PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Sean Davis wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 02:44:49AM +0100, Daniel Jung wrote:
> >
> >>Hi all
> >>
> >>[LambdaMOO 1.8.0r5]
> >>
> >>Please do this:
> >>
> >> eval me:tell(me ? "I exist" | "I don't exist")
> >>
> >>MOO objects don
Sean Davis wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 02:44:49AM +0100, Daniel Jung wrote:
Hi all
[LambdaMOO 1.8.0r5]
Please do this:
eval me:tell(me ? "I exist" | "I don't exist")
MOO objects don't seem to be "true", and I cannot see why. Could anyone
enlighten me please. Both "banana", 14, {1,2,3} and #1
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 02:44:49AM +0100, Daniel Jung wrote:
> Hi all
>
> [LambdaMOO 1.8.0r5]
>
> Please do this:
>
>eval me:tell(me ? "I exist" | "I don't exist")
>
> MOO objects don't seem to be "true", and I cannot see why. Could anyone
> enlighten me please. Both "banana", 14, {1,2,3}
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 17:44, Daniel Jung wrote:
> Please do this:
>
> eval me:tell(me ? "I exist" | "I don't exist")
>
> MOO objects don't seem to be "true", and I cannot see why. Could anyone
> enlighten me please. Both "banana", 14, {1,2,3} and #1 should exist.
Object numbers are always
