> with ::Role:: being in the middle of the name, rather than at the
> beginning or at the end.
Again, I'm not sure this answers anything at all. Would it make more
sense to put ::Moose:: in the package name of classes that used Moose
internally? If no, why? What is your opinion if someone creates
The roles I've made have supported normal classes in their
distributions, so, for example:
Perl::Dist::WiX::Role::Asset
WiX3::Role::Traceable
WiX3::XML::Role::GeneratesGUID
WiX3::XML::Role::Tag
WiX3::XML::Role::TagAllowsChildTags
with ::Role:: being in the middle of the name, rather than at the
b
