On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 01:02:37AM -0800, Darren Duncan wrote: > Does that policy apply to commercial operating systems as well, > where people may choose to run older OSs on purpose, but may want to > run newer Perl? For example, lots of Mac OS X Snow Leopard installs > out there, and it came with Perl 5.10.1. In contrast, Mac OS X > Mavericks comes with 5.16.2. Or should we expect people in that > situation would install their own Perl if they want newer Moose? -- > Darren Duncan
I would say yes. The fact that Mac OS 10.6.8 (which I run on my primary development box at home) only has perl 5.10.1 is not relevant given that there is a newer version of the OS (10.9) available. Also note that any change in the minimum supported Perl version is not likely to have any effect on the *actual minimum version required*, at least in the short term. We will generally continue to accept patches for older Perls, so long as they do not hinder current or future development. I would expect Moose to continue to work on perl 5.8.x as long as all its dependencies also continue to do so. -- "Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'" - Isaac Asimov . . . . . Karen Etheridge, ka...@etheridge.ca GCS C+++$ USL+++$ P+++$ w--- M++