Test::Exception (and its terrifying prereq, Sub::Uplevel) have caused us a few
breaks-in-blead situations.
This week, I released Test::Fatal, which provides a much simpler way to test
for code that throws exceptions. It uses Try::Tiny and does not try to hide
its calling stack frames.
The
On Oct 24, 2010, at 1:23 PM, Ricardo Signes wrote:
Test::Exception (and its terrifying prereq, Sub::Uplevel) have
caused us a few
breaks-in-blead situations.
This week, I released Test::Fatal, which provides a much simpler way
to test
for code that throws exceptions. It uses Try::Tiny
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 01:23:57PM -0400, Ricardo Signes wrote:
The branch rfc/test-fatal completely removes any dependency on
Test::Exception,
and thus on Sub::Uplevel. I had originally planned to rewrite all the test
files, but this quickly became too boring and overwhelming. Instead,
* Karen Etheridge p...@froods.org [2010-10-24T15:55:52]
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 01:23:57PM -0400, Ricardo Signes wrote:
The branch rfc/test-fatal completely removes any dependency on
Test::Exception, and thus on Sub::Uplevel. I had originally planned to
rewrite all the test files, but this