request for merge: replace Test::Exception with Test::Fatal

2010-10-24 Thread Ricardo Signes
Test::Exception (and its terrifying prereq, Sub::Uplevel) have caused us a few breaks-in-blead situations. This week, I released Test::Fatal, which provides a much simpler way to test for code that throws exceptions. It uses Try::Tiny and does not try to hide its calling stack frames. The

Re: request for merge: replace Test::Exception with Test::Fatal

2010-10-24 Thread Stevan Little
On Oct 24, 2010, at 1:23 PM, Ricardo Signes wrote: Test::Exception (and its terrifying prereq, Sub::Uplevel) have caused us a few breaks-in-blead situations. This week, I released Test::Fatal, which provides a much simpler way to test for code that throws exceptions. It uses Try::Tiny

Re: request for merge: replace Test::Exception with Test::Fatal

2010-10-24 Thread Karen Etheridge
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 01:23:57PM -0400, Ricardo Signes wrote: The branch rfc/test-fatal completely removes any dependency on Test::Exception, and thus on Sub::Uplevel. I had originally planned to rewrite all the test files, but this quickly became too boring and overwhelming. Instead,

Re: request for merge: replace Test::Exception with Test::Fatal

2010-10-24 Thread Ricardo Signes
* Karen Etheridge p...@froods.org [2010-10-24T15:55:52] On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 01:23:57PM -0400, Ricardo Signes wrote: The branch rfc/test-fatal completely removes any dependency on Test::Exception, and thus on Sub::Uplevel. I had originally planned to rewrite all the test files, but this