Re: [MOPO] DRACULA-gate and Profile's Part in it

2009-10-02 Thread Richard Evans
...@listserv.american.edu] On Behalf Of James Richard Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 1:30 PM To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Subject: [MOPO] DRACULA-gate and Profile's Part in it Steve, While I think Profiles did a poor job of presenting the poster with their low-quality pictures and initial

[MOPO] DRACULA-gate and Profile's Part in it

2009-10-01 Thread James Richard
Steve, While I think Profiles did a poor job of presenting the poster with their low-quality pictures and initial sketchy description, they actually *did* take responsibility and do the right thing prior to putting it in their catalog -- they went to one of the most respected experts in the

Re: [MOPO] DRACULA-gate and Profile's Part in it

2009-10-01 Thread Steven F. Poole
was offered on consignment? That really ratchets him and his poster division up several notches in trust for me. Steve - Original Message - From: James Richard To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 1:29 PM Subject: [MOPO] DRACULA-gate

Re: [MOPO] DRACULA-gate and Profile's Part in it

2009-10-01 Thread Smith, Grey - 1367
Subject: [MOPO] DRACULA-gate and Profile's Part in it Steve, While I think Profiles did a poor job of presenting the poster with their low-quality pictures and initial sketchy description, they actually *did* take responsibility and do the right thing prior to putting it in their catalog

Re: [MOPO] DRACULA-gate and Profile's Part in it

2009-10-01 Thread Tom Martin
Of James Richard Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 1:30 PM To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Subject: [MOPO] DRACULA-gate and Profile's Part in it Steve, While I think Profiles did a poor job of presenting the poster with their low-quality pictures and initial sketchy description